Tag: data catalog

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

A Guide to CCPA Compliance and How the California Consumer Privacy Act Compares to GDPR

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) compliance shares many of the same requirements in the European Unions’ General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

While the CCPA has been signed into law, organizations have until Jan. 1, 2020, to enact its mandates. Luckily, many organizations have already laid the regulatory groundwork for it because of their efforts to comply with GDPR.

However, there are some key differences that we’ll explore in the Q&A below.

Data governance, thankfully, provides a framework for compliance with either or both – in addition to other regulatory mandates your organization may be subject to.

CCPA Compliance Requirements vs. GDPR FAQ

Does CCPA apply to not-for-profit organizations? 

No, CCPA compliance only applies to for-profit organizations. GDPR compliance is required for any organization, public or private (including not-for-profit).

What for-profit businesses does CCPA apply to?

The mandate for CCPA compliance only applies if a for-profit organization:

  • Has an annual gross revenue exceeding $25 million
  • Collects, sells or shares the personal data of 50,000 or more consumers, households or devices
  • Earns 50% of more of its annual revenue by selling consumers’ personal information

Does the CCPA apply outside of California?

As the name suggests, the legislation is designed to protect the personal data of consumers who reside in the state of California.

But like GDPR, CCPA compliance has impacts outside the area of origin. This means businesses located outside of California, but selling to (or collecting the data of) California residents must also comply.

Does the CCPA exclude anything that GDPR doesn’t? 

GDPR encompasses all categories of “personal data,” with no distinctions.

CCPA does make distinctions, particularly when other regulations may overlap. These include:

  • Medical information covered by the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
  • Personal information covered by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
  • Personal information covered by the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA)
  • Clinical trial data
  • Information sold to or by consumer reporting agencies
  • Publicly available personal information (federal, state and local government records)

What about access requests? 

Under the GDPR, organizations must make any personal data collected from an EU citizen available upon request.

CCPA compliance only requires data collected within the last 12 months to be shared upon request.

Does the CCPA include the right to opt out?

CCPA, like GDPR, empowers gives consumers/citizens the right to opt out in regard to the processing of their personal data.

However, CCPA compliance only requires an organization to observe an opt-out request when it comes to the sale of personal data. GDPR does not make any distinctions between “selling” personal data and any other kind of data processing.

To meet CCPA compliance opt-out standards, organizations must provide a “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” link on their home pages.

Does the CCPA require individuals to willingly opt in?

No. Whereas the GDPR requires informed consent before an organization sells an individual’s information, organizations under the scope of the CCPA can still assume consent. The only exception involves the personal information of children (under 16). Children over 13 can consent themselves, but if the consumer is a child under 13, a parent or guardian must authorize the sale of said child’s personal data.

What about fines for CCPA non-compliance? 

In theory, fines for CCPA non-compliance are potentially more far reaching than those of GDPR because there is no ceiling for CCPA penalties. Under GDPR, penalties have a ceiling of 4% of global annual revenue or €20 million, whichever is greater. GDPR recently resulted in a record fine for Google.

Organizations outside of CCPA compliance can only be fined up to $7,500 per violation, but there is no upper ceiling.

CCPA compliance is a data governance issue

Data Governance for Regulatory Compliance

While CCPA has a more narrow geography and focus than GDPR, compliance is still a serious effort for organizations under its scope. And as data-driven business continues to expand, so too will the pressure on lawmakers to regulate how organizations process data. Remember the Facebook hearings and now inquiries into Google and Twitter, for example?

Regulatory compliance remains a key driver for data governance. After all, to understand how to meet data regulations, an organization must first understand its data.

An effective data governance initiative should enable just that, by giving an organization the tools to:

  • Discover data: Identify and interrogate metadata from various data management silos
  • Harvest data: Automate the collection of metadata from various data management silos and consolidate it into a single source
  • Structure data: Connect physical metadata to specific business terms and definitions and reusable design standards
  • Analyze data: Understand how data relates to the business and what attributes it has
  • Map data flows: Identify where to integrate data and track how it moves and transforms
  • Govern data: Develop a governance model to manage standards and policies and set best practices
  • Socialize data: Enable all stakeholders to see data in one place in their own context

A Regulatory EDGE

The erwin EDGE software platform creates an “enterprise data governance experience” to transform how all stakeholders discover, understand, govern and socialize data assets. It includes enterprise modeling, data cataloging and data literacy capabilities, giving organizations visibility and control over their disparate architectures and all the supporting data.

Both IT and business stakeholders have role-based, self-service access to the information they need to collaborate in making strategic decisions. And because many of the associated processes can be automated, you reduce errors and increase the speed and quality of your data pipeline. This data intelligence unlocks knowledge and value.

The erwin EDGE provides the most agile, efficient and cost-effective means of launching and sustaining a strategic and comprehensive data governance initiative, whether you wish to deploy on premise or in the cloud. But you don’t have to implement every component of the erwin EDGE all at once to see strategic value.

Because of the platform’s federated design, you can address your organization’s most urgent needs, such as regulatory compliance, first. Then you can proactively address other organization objectives, such as operational efficiency, revenue growth, increasing customer satisfaction and improving overall decision-making.

You can learn more about leveraging data governance to navigate the changing tide of data regulations here.

Are you compliant with data regulations?

Categories
erwin Expert Blog Data Governance

Data Governance Frameworks: The Key to Successful Data Governance Implementation

A strong data governance framework is central to successful data governance implementation in any data-driven organization because it ensures that data is properly maintained, protected and maximized.

But despite this fact, enterprises often face push back when implementing a new data governance initiative or trying to mature an existing one.

Let’s assume you have some form of informal data governance operation with some strengths to build on and some weaknesses to correct. Some parts of the organization are engaged and behind the initiative, while others are skeptical about its relevance or benefits.

Some other common data governance implementation obstacles include:

  • Questions about where to begin and how to prioritize which data streams to govern first
  • Issues regarding data quality and ownership
  • Concerns about data lineage
  • Competing project and resources (time, people and funding)

By using a data governance framework, organizations can formalize their data governance implementation and subsequent adherence to. This addressess common concerns including data quality and data lineage, and provides a clear path to successful data governance implementation.

In this blog, we will cover three key steps to successful data governance implementation. We will also look into how we can expand the scope and depth of a data governance framework to ensure data governance standards remain high.

Data Governance Implementation in 3 Steps

When maturing or implementing data governance and/or a data governance framework, an accurate assessment of the ‘here and now’ is key. Then you can rethink the path forward, identifying any current policies or business processes that should be incorporated, being careful to avoid making the same mistakes of prior iterations.

With this in mind, here are three steps we recommend for implementing data governance and a data governance framework.

Data Governance Framework

Step 1: Shift the culture toward data governance

Data governance isn’t something to set and forget; it’s a strategic approach that needs to evolve over time in response to new opportunities and challenges. Therefore, a successful data governance framework has to become part of the organization’s culture but such a shift requires listening – and remembering that it’s about people, empowerment and accountability.

In most cases, a new data governance framework requires people – those in IT and across the business, including risk management and information security – to change how they work. Any concerns they raise or recommendations they make should be considered. You can encourage feedback through surveys, workshops and open dialog.

Once input has been discussed and plan agreed upon, it is critical to update roles and responsibilities, provide training and ensure ongoing communication. Many organizations now have internal certifications for different data governance roles who wear these badges with pride.

A top-down management approach will get a data governance initiative off the ground, but only bottom-up cultural adoption will carry it out.

Step 2: Refine the data governance framework

The right capabilities and tools are important for fueling an accurate, real-time data pipeline and governing it for maximum security, quality and value. For example:

Data cataloging – Organization’s implementing a data governance framework will benefit from automated metadata harvesting, data mapping, code generation and data lineage with reference data management, lifecycle management and data quality. With these capabilities, you can  efficiently integrate and activate enterprise data within a single, unified catalog in accordance with business requirements.

Data literacy – Being able to discover what data is available and understand what it means in common, standardized terms is important because data elements may mean different things to different parts of the organization. A business glossary answers this need, as does the ability for stakeholders to view data relevant to their roles and understand it within a business context through a role-based portal.

Such tools are further enhanced if they can be integrated across data and business architectures and when they promote self-service and collaboration, which also are important to the cultural shift.

 

Subscribe to the erwin Expert Blog

Once you submit the trial request form, an erwin representative will be in touch to verify your request and help you start data modeling.

 

 

Step 3: Prioritize then scale the data governance framework

Because data governance is on-going, it’s important to prioritize the initial areas of focus and scale from there. Organizations that start with 30 to 50 data items are generally more successful than those that attempt more than 1,000 in the early stages.

Find some representative (familiar) data items and create examples for data ownership, quality, lineage and definition so stakeholders can see real examples of the data governance framework in action. For example:

  • Data ownership model showing a data item, its definition, producers, consumers, stewards and quality rules (for profiling)
  • Workflow showing the creation, enrichment and approval of the above data item to demonstrate collaboration

Whether your organization is just adopting data governance or the goal is to refine an existing data governance framework, the erwin DG RediChek will provide helpful insights to guide you in the journey.

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

What’s Business Process Modeling Got to Do with It? – Choosing A BPM Tool

With business process modeling (BPM) being a key component of data governance, choosing a BPM tool is part of a dilemma many businesses either have or will soon face.

Historically, BPM didn’t necessarily have to be tied to an organization’s data governance initiative.

However, data-driven business and the regulations that oversee it are becoming increasingly extensive, so the need to view data governance as a collective effort – in terms of personnel and the tools that make up the strategy – is becoming harder to ignore.

Data governance also relies on business process modeling and analysis to drive improvement, including identifying business practices susceptible to security, compliance or other risks and adding controls to mitigate exposures.

Choosing a BPM Tool: An Overview

As part of a data governance strategy, a BPM tool aids organizations in visualizing their business processes, system interactions and organizational hierarchies to ensure elements are aligned and core operations are optimized.

The right BPM tool also helps organizations increase productivity, reduce errors and mitigate risks to achieve strategic objectives.

With  insights from the BPM tool, you can clarify roles and responsibilities – which in turn should influence an organization’s policies about data ownership and make data lineage easier to manage.

Organizations also can use a BPM tool to identify the staff who function as “unofficial data repositories.” This has both a primary and secondary function:

1. Organizations can document employee processes to ensure vital information isn’t lost should an employee choose to leave.

2. It is easier to identify areas where expertise may need to be bolstered.

Organizations that adopt a BPM tool also enjoy greater process efficiency. This is through a combination of improving existing processes or designing new process flows, eliminating unnecessary or contradictory steps, and documenting results in a shareable format that is easy to understand so the organization is pulling in one direction.

Choosing a BPM Tool

Silo Buster

Understanding the typical use cases for business process modeling is the first step. As with any tech investment, it’s important to understand how the technology will work in the context of your organization/business.

For example, it’s counter-productive to invest in a solution that reduces informational silos only to introduce a new technological silo through a lack of integration.

Ideally, organizations want a BPM tool that works in conjunction with the wider data management platform and data governance initiative – not one that works against them.

That means it must support data imports and integrations from/with external sources, a solution that enables in-tool collaboration to reduce departmental silos, and most crucial, a solution that taps into a central metadata repository to ensure consistency across the whole data management and governance initiatives.

The lack of a central metadata repository is a far too common thorn in an organization’s side. Without it, they have to juggle multiple versions as changes to the underlying data aren’t automatically updated across the platform.

It also means organizations waste crucial time manually manufacturing and maintaining data quality, when an automation framework could achieve the same goal instantaneously, without human error and with greater consistency.

A central metadata repository ensures an organization can acknowledge and get behind a single source of truth. This has a wealth of favorable consequences including greater cohesion across the organization, better data quality and trust, and faster decision-making with less false starts due to plans based on misleading information.

Three Key Questions to Ask When Choosing a BPM Tool

Organizations in the market for a BPM tool should also consider the following:

1. Configurability: Does the tool support the ability to model and analyze business processes with links to data, applications and other aspects of your organization? And how easy is this to achieve?

2. Role-based views: Can the tool develop integrated business models for a single source of truth but with different views for different stakeholders based on their needs – making regulatory compliance more manageable? Does it enable cross-functional and enterprise collaboration through discussion threads, surveys and other social features?

3. Business and IT infrastructure interoperability: How well does the tool integrate with other key components of data governance including enterprise architecture, data modeling, data cataloging and data literacy? Can it aid in providing data intelligence to connect all the pieces of the data management and governance lifecycles?

For more information and to find out how such a solution can integrate with your organization and current data management and data governance initiatives, click here.

BPM Tool - erwin BP powered by Casewise

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Data Mapping Tools: What Are the Key Differentiators

The need for data mapping tools in light of increasing volumes and varieties of data – as well as the velocity at which it must be processed – is growing.

It’s not difficult to see why either. Data mapping tools have always been a key asset for any organization looking to leverage data for insights.

Isolated units of data are essentially meaningless. By linking data and enabling its categorization in relation to other data units, data mapping provides the context vital for actionable information.

Now with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in effect, data mapping has become even more significant.

The scale of GDPR’s reach has set a new precedent and is the closest we’ve come to a global standard in terms of data regulations. The repercussions can be huge – just ask Google.

Data mapping tools are paramount in charting a path to compliance for said new, near-global standard and avoiding the hefty fines.

Because of GDPR, organizations that may not have fully leveraged data mapping for proactive data-driven initiatives (e.g., analysis) are now adopting data mapping tools with compliance in mind.

Arguably, GDPR’s implementation can be viewed as an opportunity – a catalyst for digital transformation.

Those organizations investing in data mapping tools with compliance as the main driver will definitely want to consider this opportunity and have it influence their decision as to which data mapping tool to adopt.

With that in mind, it’s important to understand the key differentiators in data mapping tools and the associated benefits.

Data Mapping Tools: erwin Mapping Manager

Data Mapping Tools: Automated or Manual?

In terms of differentiators for data mapping tools, perhaps the most distinct is automated data mapping versus data mapping via manual processes.

Data mapping tools that allow for automation mean organizations can benefit from in-depth, quality-assured data mapping, without the significant allocations of resources typically associated with such projects.

Eighty percent of data scientists’ and other data professionals’ time is spent on manual data maintenance. That’s anything and everything from addressing errors and inconsistencies and trying to understand source data or track its lineage. This doesn’t even account for the time lost due to missed errors that contribute to inherently flawed endeavors.

Automated data mapping tools render such issues and concerns void. In turn, data professionals’ time can be put to much better, proactive use, rather than them being bogged down with reactive, house-keeping tasks.

FOUR INDUSTRY FOCUSSED CASE STUDIES FOR AUTOMATED METADATA-DRIVEN AUTOMATION 
(BFSI, PHARMA, INSURANCE AND NON-PROFIT) 

 

As well as introducing greater efficiency to the data governance process, automated data mapping tools enable data to be auto-documented from XML that builds mappings for the target repository or reporting structure.

Additionally, a tool that leverages and draws from a single metadata repository means that mappings are dynamically linked with underlying metadata to render automated lineage views, including full transformation logic in real time.

Therefore, changes (e.g., in the data catalog) will be reflected across data governance domains (business process, enterprise architecture and data modeling) as and when they’re made – no more juggling and maintaining multiple, out-of-date versions.

It also enables automatic impact analysis at the table and column level – even for business/transformation rules.

For organizations looking to free themselves from the burden of juggling multiple versions, siloed business processes and a disconnect between interdepartmental collaboration, this feature is a key benefit to consider.

Data Mapping Tools: Other Differentiators

In light of the aforementioned changes to data regulations, many organizations will need to consider the extent of a data mapping tool’s data lineage capabilities.

The ability to reverse-engineer and document the business logic from your reporting structures for true source-to-report lineage is key because it makes analysis (and the trust in said analysis) easier. And should a data breach occur, affected data/persons can be more quickly identified in accordance with GDPR.

Article 33 of GDPR requires organizations to notify the appropriate supervisory authority “without undue delay and, where, feasible, not later than 72 hours” after discovering a breach.

As stated above, a data governance platform that draws from a single metadata source is even more advantageous here.

Mappings can be synchronized with metadata so that source or target metadata changes can be automatically pushed into the mappings – so your mappings stay up to date with little or no effort.

The Data Mapping Tool For Data-Driven Businesses

Nobody likes manual documentation. It’s arduous, error-prone and a waste of resources. Quite frankly, it’s dated.

Any organization looking to invest in data mapping, data preparation and/or data cataloging needs to make automation a priority.

With automated data mapping, organizations can achieve “true data intelligence,”. That being the ability to tell the story of how data enters the organization and changes throughout the entire lifecycle to the consumption/reporting layer.  If you’re working harder than your tool, you have the wrong tool.

The manual tools of old do not have auto documentation capabilities, cannot produce outbound code for multiple ETL or script types, and are a liability in terms of accuracy and GDPR.

Automated data mapping is the only path to true GDPR compliance, and erwin Mapping Manager can get you there in a matter of weeks thanks to our robust reverse-engineering technology. 

Learn more about erwin’s automation framework for data governance here.

Automate Data Mapping

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Data Governance Stock Check: Using Data Governance to Take Stock of Your Data Assets

For regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR) and to ensure peak business performance, organizations often bring consultants on board to help take stock of their data assets. This sort of data governance “stock check” is important but can be arduous without the right approach and technology. That’s where data governance comes in …

While most companies hold the lion’s share of operational data within relational databases, it also can live in many other places and various other formats. Therefore, organizations need the ability to manage any data from anywhere, what we call our “any-squared” (Any2) approach to data governance.

Any2 first requires an understanding of the ‘3Vs’ of data – volume, variety and velocity – especially in context of the data lifecycle, as well as knowing how to leverage the key  capabilities of data governance – data cataloging, data literacy, business process, enterprise architecture and data modeling – that enable data to be leveraged at different stages for optimum security, quality and value.

Following are two examples that illustrate the data governance stock check, including the Any2 approach in action, based on real consulting engagements.

Data Governance Stock Check

Data Governance “Stock Check” Case 1: The Data Broker

This client trades in information. Therefore, the organization needed to catalog the data it acquires from suppliers, ensure its quality, classify it, and then sell it to customers. The company wanted to assemble the data in a data warehouse and then provide controlled access to it.

The first step in helping this client involved taking stock of its existing data. We set up a portal so data assets could be registered via a form with basic questions, and then a central team received the registrations, reviewed and prioritized them. Entitlement attributes also were set up to identify and profile high-priority assets.

A number of best practices and technology solutions were used to establish the data required for managing the registration and classification of data feeds:

1. The underlying metadata is harvested followed by an initial quality check. Then the metadata is classified against a semantic model held in a business glossary.

2. After this classification, a second data quality check is performed based on the best-practice rules associated with the semantic model.

3. Profiled assets are loaded into a historical data store within the warehouse, with data governance tools generating its structure and data movement operations for data loading.

4. We developed a change management program to make all staff aware of the information brokerage portal and the importance of using it. It uses a catalog of data assets, all classified against a semantic model with data quality metrics to easily understand where data assets are located within the data warehouse.

5. Adopting this portal, where data is registered and classified against an ontology, enables the client’s customers to shop for data by asset or by meaning (e.g., “what data do you have on X topic?”) and then drill down through the taxonomy or across an ontology. Next, they raise a request to purchase the desired data.

This consulting engagement and technology implementation increased data accessibility and capitalization. Information is registered within a central portal through an approved workflow, and then customers shop for data either from a list of physical assets or by information content, with purchase requests also going through an approval workflow. This, among other safeguards, ensures data quality.

Benefits of Data Governance

Data Governance “Stock Check” Case 2: Tracking Rogue Data

This client has a geographically-dispersed organization that stored many of its key processes in Microsoft Excel TM spreadsheets. They were planning to move to Office 365TM and were concerned about regulatory compliance, including GDPR mandates.

Knowing that electronic documents are heavily used in key business processes and distributed across the organization, this company needed to replace risky manual processes with centralized, automated systems.

A key part of the consulting engagement was to understand what data assets were in circulation and how they were used by the organization. Then process chains could be prioritized to automate and outline specifications for the system to replace them.

This organization also adopted a central portal that allowed employees to register data assets. The associated change management program raised awareness of data governance across the organization and the importance of data registration.

For each asset, information was captured and reviewed as part of a workflow. Prioritized assets were then chosen for profiling, enabling metadata to be reverse-engineered before being classified against the business glossary.

Additionally, assets that were part of a process chain were gathered and modeled with enterprise architecture (EA) and business process (BP) modeling tools for impact analysis.

High-level requirements for new systems then could be defined again in the EA/BP tools and prioritized on a project list. For the others, decisions could be made on whether they could safely be placed in the cloud and whether macros would be required.

In this case, the adoption of purpose-built data governance solutions helped build an understanding of the data assets in play, including information about their usage and content to aid in decision-making.

This client then had a good handle of the “what” and “where” in terms of sensitive data stored in their systems. They also better understood how this sensitive data was being used and by whom, helping reduce regulatory risks like those associated with GDPR.

In both scenarios, we cataloged data assets and mapped them to a business glossary. It acts as a classification scheme to help govern data and located data, making it both more accessible and valuable. This governance framework reduces risk and protects its most valuable or sensitive data assets.

Focused on producing meaningful business outcomes, the erwin EDGE platform was pivotal in achieving these two clients’ data governance goals – including the infrastructure to undertake a data governance stock check. They used it to create an “enterprise data governance experience” not just for cataloging data and other foundational tasks, but also for a competitive “EDGE” in maximizing the value of their data while reducing data-related risks.

To learn more about the erwin EDGE data governance platform and how it aids in undertaking a data governance stock check, register for our free, 30-minute demonstration here.

Categories
erwin Expert Blog Data Governance Data Intelligence

Demystifying Data Lineage: Tracking Your Data’s DNA

Getting the most out of your data requires getting a handle on data lineage. That’s knowing what data you have, where it is, and where it came from – plus understanding its quality and value to the organization.

But you can’t understand your data in a business context much less track data lineage, its physical existence and maximize its security, quality and value if it’s scattered across different silos in numerous applications.

Data lineage provides a way of tracking data from its origin to destination across its lifespan and all the processes it’s involved in. It also plays a vital role in data governance. Beyond the simple ability to know where the data came from and whether or not it can be trusted, there’s an element of statutory reporting and compliance that often requires a knowledge of how that same data (known or unknown, governed or not) has changed over time.

A platform that provides insights like data lineage, impact analysis, full-history capture, and other data management features serves as a central hub from which everything can be learned and discovered about the data – whether a data lake, a data vault or a traditional data warehouse.

In a traditional data management organization, Excel spreadsheets are used to manage the incoming data design, what’s known as the “pre-ETL” mapping documentation, but this does not provide any sort of visibility or auditability. In fact, each unit of work represented in these ‘mapping documents’ becomes an independent variable in the overall system development lifecycle, and therefore nearly impossible to learn from much less standardize.

The key to accuracy and integrity in any exercise is to eliminate the opportunity for human error – which does not mean eliminating humans from the process but incorporating the right tools to reduce the likelihood of error as the human beings apply their thought processes to the work.

Data Lineage

Data Lineage: A Crucial First Step for Data Governance

Knowing what data you have and where it lives and where it came from is complicated. The lack of visibility and control around “data at rest” combined with “data in motion,” as well as difficulties with legacy architectures, means organizations spend more time finding the data they need rather than using it to produce meaningful business outcomes.

Organizations need to create and sustain an enterprise-wide view of and easy access to underlying metadata, but that’s a tall order with numerous data types and data sources that were never designed to work together and data infrastructures that have been cobbled together over time with disparate technologies, poor documentation and little thought for downstream integration. So the applications and initiatives that depend on a solid data infrastructure may be compromised, resulting in faulty analyses.

These issues can be addressed with a strong data management strategy underpinned by technology that enables the data quality the business requires, which encompasses data cataloging (integration of data sets from various sources), mapping, versioning, business rules and glossaries maintenance and metadata management (associations and lineage).

An automated, metadata-driven framework for cataloging data assets and their flows across the business provides an efficient, agile and dynamic way to generate data lineage from operational source systems (databases, data models, file-based systems, unstructured files and more) across the information management architecture; construct business glossaries; assess what data aligns with specific business rules and policies; and inform how that data is transformed, integrated and federated throughout business processes – complete with full documentation.

Centralized design, immediate lineage and impact analysis, and change-activity logging means you will always have answers readily available, or just a few clicks away. Subsets of data can be identified and generated via predefined templates, generic designs generated from standard mapping documents, and pushed via ETL process for faster processing via automation templates.

With automation, data quality is systemically assured and the data pipeline is seamlessly governed and operationalized to the benefit of all stakeholders. Without such automation, business transformation will be stymied. Companies, especially large ones with thousands of systems, files and processes, will be particularly challenged by a manual approach. And outsourcing these data management efforts to professional services firms only increases costs and schedule delays.

With erwin Mapping Manager, organizations can automate enterprise data mapping and code generation for faster time-to-value and greater accuracy when it comes to data movement projects, as well as synchronize “data in motion” with data management and governance efforts.

Map data elements to their sources within a single repository to determine data lineage, deploy data warehouses and other Big Data solutions, and harmonize data integration across platforms. The web-based solution reduces the need for specialized, technical resources with knowledge of ETL and database procedural code, while making it easy for business analysts, data architects, ETL developers, testers and project managers to collaborate for faster decision-making.

Data Lineage