Categories
Uncategorized

Ideation & Enterprise Architecture for Better Business Outcomes

Thomas Edison’s legacy in innovation is such that his most famous invention, the light bulb, has become a symbol depicting great ideas around the world. By now, we’ve innovated beyond what Thomas Edison could have ever dreamed of. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t still lessons to be learned.

He once famously said that, “vision without execution is just hallucination.” And that just so happens to tie in perfectly with what we’ll cover today as we examine how combining Ideation and Enterprise Architecture can benefit a business outcome approach.

We established what business outcome driven Enterprise Architecture (EA) is earlier, in this post. But to recap, Gartner define business outcome driven EA as a practical approach to supporting EA, that starts and ends with a focus on delivering signature-ready and actionable recommendations to business and IT leaders so they can adjust policies and projects in order to achieve targeted business outcomes, based on the business direction and relevant business disruptions.

But what is Ideation?

Although inventions and ground-breaking ideas are often credited to one person, the recipient of said credit, rarely works alone. History has taught us that innovation is a team sport. A collaborative effort that thrives on hive mind like contributions and co-creation. After all, one of Edison’s first lessons, and arguably one of his strongest legacies, was his introduction of mass production and large-scale teamwork to the invention process, essentially birthing modern research labs we are familiar with today.

The reality of the innovation process then, is that it can quite easily become chaotic. Ideation is the process of managing such chaos, and wielding it in such a way that it benefits the organization at large. Simply put, Ideation is the act of generating and capturing ideas (related to processes, products, services, and customer experiences) that applies a set of practical and rigorous methods, tools, and frameworks.

How is ideation and innovation managed in your organization?

I ask that you answer this honestly. And I ask this because in a lot of cases, when asked “How is ideation and innovation managed in your organization?” the truthful answer is “it isn’t.”

For many businesses, this presents a set of hurdles and gates to progression.

Firstly, many employers don’t put enough value on suggestions and ideas from their employees, and if they do, they do without having installed the proper systems and avenues to efficiently collect said suggestions and ideas. Business leaders need to implement structured and open mechanisms to collect proposals from employees at all levels. This way, these ideas can be properly noted, considered, and if right for the business, implemented. And those ideas that aren’t can be met with feedback and suggestions.

Alternatively, a business could adopt a more ad hoc approach to innovation, and risk quality suggestions disappearing into a black hole. Reluctance to do this will hurt a business twofold. In both limiting innovation by having suggestions fall through the cracks, and discouraging and demoralising the workforce because they feel as though they are being ignored.

The second hurdle businesses typically face, is a disconnect between the idea and its implementation. Both of these hurdles are clearly detrimental, with the latter being less abstractly so. A disconnect between an idea and its implementation is a guaranteed factor in decreasing efficiency and adding redundancies in technology and processes into procedure.

The four primary forces shaping innovation

Innovation is primarily influenced by four factors – Business, technology, design and society.

  • Business – What is viable in the market? Where are the market gaps and how can we fill them?
  • Technology – What is possible with new and emerging technologies, and how can we leverage them to create new offerings.
  • Design – What do people desire? How can we create solutions that people will gravitate to?
  • Society – What is sustainable for the community and environment?

To increase the chances of successful innovation, business leaders should aim to integrate these forces with the outcome being innovations delivering higher user and economic value.

So how can we marry Ideation and Enterprise Architecture in order to achieve better Business Outcomes?

A great place to start to tackle this, is the innovation management funnel, or pipeline. Managing the innovation management funnel involves three very different tasks. The first is to expand the entrance of the pipeline – the organization must promote its challenges and campaigns in order to increase the number of new product and new process ideas.

The second task is to narrow the funnel neck – ideas generated must be prioritized and resources focused on the most attractive opportunities that are aligned with business goals.

The third task is to ensure that the selected projects deliver on the promises and return on investment anticipated when the project was approved.

Innovation Lifecycle

Kanban boards provide the enabling mechanism for managing the pipeline. A Kanban board is produced to represent the innovation management funnel.

We can then expand on promising ideas and initiatives by slotting them into the Strategic Planning Lifecycle.

Innovation in Strategic Planning Lifecycle

The above figure demonstrates how the strategic planning lifecycle supports an ‘ideas to delivery’ framework. The high level relationship between the strategy and goals of an organization and the projects that deliver the change to meet these goals, are shown here. Enterprise Architecture intercepts the ideation process, to ensure that businesses “do the right things,” (prioritization) and “do things right” (implementation). The Enterprise Architecture provides the model to govern the delivery of projects in line with these goals.

Alongside the strategic planning lifecycle, and innovation management funnel. Businesses should utilize other tools including Campaign Management. This can help in making the processes behind innovation more transparent, and ensure everybody is both up to date, and on board. You’ll be able to determine:

  1. What technology is there – is it new or existing
  2. Whether it fits into tactical, or strategic technology
  3. Get a head start on what others are doing in the business

Another key asset of the EA+IM mantra, is collaboration. Much of this feeds back into earlier sentiments about the importance and value of ideas from employees of the business at large. A tool that promotes collaboration can help in a number of ways including:

  • Engagement with broader business users
  • Directly collaborate with non R&D individuals
  • Organizing workload with kanban boards
  • Task management across stakeholders (Communities)

Comment systems and gamification can also be introduced to encourage participation even at the base levels of the business.

In Summary

By incorporating an Innovation Management process as part of an overall blueprint of the business, we can, in essence, create a hive mind approach to innovation, whereby business leaders, stakeholders and employees across the hierarchy are all innovating to improve the business. This, in turn will maximize technology investments to provide positive business outcomes.

Categories
Uncategorized

Enterprise Architecture for Delivering an Internet of Things Strategy

The Internet of Things (IoT) provides an excellent opportunity for businesses. The two way channel that connected devices open up between the consumer and business offer unprecedented levels of insight into customer needs wants and habits.

It’s not surprising then, that IoT has taken off. As more and more businesses from varying sectors begin to adopt IoT, it’s becoming clear that we’re in the midst of a quiet (but rapid) technology revolution.

Internet of things adoption prediction

The current trends indicate that at some point, most if not all businesses will have to adopt IoT, at least to some degree. However, adoptions such as these can often be disruptive, and so are not without risk. The key to managing any sort of risk is strategy, and in this case, an Enterprise Architecture strategy.

At least Mike Walker believes as much. The Research Director at leading analytic firm, Gartner, argues that IoT opportunities for a business are also opportunities for Enterprise Architects to establish themselves as a focal point of an organization.

“Enterprise architects have a great opportunity to position themselves at the heart of digital businesses,” he said. “This could take the form of establishing a business competency center that explores how the IoT can create innovative breakthroughs for the organization’s business models, products and services through rapid experimentation.”

Enterprise Architecture & The Internet of Things – Chaos, Disruption & Ladders

Enterprise Architecture is employed to help lead a business towards a strategic outcome. Businesses should not only want to navigate through times of disruption, but capitalize on them too.

If you’re familiar with HBO’s hit TV show, Game of Thrones (or the book series that inspired it) you’ll enjoy this metaphor. If not, stick with us. It’ll only take a minute. In an empowering speech, Petyr “Littlefinger” Baelish addresses his ascent from relative rags, to riches. He claims chaos is the driver behind his success.

“Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, are given a chance to climb. They refuse, they cling to the realm or the gods or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.”

Gods and realms aside, a lot of what Petyr said is relevant here. Petyr sees chaos as an opportunity. He acknowledges that people before him have tried to take advantage of this, and that not everyone is successful. However, Littlefinger is Game of Throne’s contentious figurehead for savvy, and it is this – his savvy, his intelligence – that steadies him during his climb.

Our chaos ladder, is disruption. And the savvy steadying us as we climb are our Enterprise Architects. As an organization, we don’t just want to navigate through disruption, we want to capitalize on it, and emerge in a better position than we were in before. This is at the core of modern Enterprise Architecture.

There’s arguably not much more disruptive to businesses at the moment, than adopting an IoT strategy where there hasn’t been one before. Therefore, it’s abundantly clear that businesses new to the concept need a solid Enterprise Architecture platform to back it up.

These adopters will be faced with incoming valuable data at a rate that they most likely haven’t seen before, and so the infrastructure to deal with it must be planned out and implemented.

Vanguard Enterprise Architects on-going role in IoT management

Much of the preparation and planning behind initially implementing an IoT strategy can be said to be the responsibility of “Foundational” Enterprise Architects. The EAs that are typically tasked with legacy EA assignments. Maintaining systems, support, the tasks we colloquially refer to as “keeping the lights on”.

However, IoT isn’t just something that can be implemented and left alone. That new influx of data, is pointless if it’s not acted on purpose.

This is where Vanguard EAs come in. Vanguard EAs represent the evolution of IT. They show how the role of IT staff has evolved in tandem with IT’s refocusing as the spearhead of most business. Unlike the Foundational EA, the Vanguard’s role is less about “keeping on the lights” and more about finding new ways to light things up.

The Vanguard EA is an innovator. An agile responder to change and early exploiter of opportunity. It’s the Vanguard EA that will be at the heart of the business, as touched on by Mike Walker earlier in the post. Vanguard EAs will be able to innovate based on the trends and habits revealed in the new influx of data, and therefore, be a catalyst of growth for the business going forward.

Categories
Enterprise Architecture erwin Expert Blog

A Business Outcome Driven Enterprise Architecture Approach

Experts are invaluable. They’re the people who have demonstrated time and time again that they can be trusted in their relevant field. However, dialogue between experts and non-experts is not always as straightforward as we’d like it to be.

We’ve all experienced it, and perhaps we’ve also been guilty of it ourselves – that is, speaking about a topic with the presumption that your audience is already caught up.

Enterprise architecture (and its architects) is no different in this regard, and perhaps more guilty than most. Enterprise Architects (EA) can often fall into the trap of demonstrating the technical wizardry behind building processes, and understandably so. This is the side of EA than an Enterprise Architect sees.

However, this generally isn’t the side that stakeholders want to see. Perhaps this is a crude analogy, but in health, you’re not too concerned with the biology behind why you’re all bunged up. The experts know why, but you just want to feel better.

You just want the outcome.

Enterprise architecture is no different. In this case, patients stakeholders want to see the solution. They want to see how a new or revised enterprise architecture initiative will bring the organization closer to it’s desired business outcomes.

This is why the traditional, standardized framework-centric take on EA has its limits (but that doesn’t mean enterprise architecture frameworks are obsolete). IT thought leader and leading Gartner researcher, Brian Burke (above) previously shed some light on this:

“Focusing on a standard EA framework doesn’t work,” he said. “In the past EA practicioners focused on deliverables that were useful to enterprise architects but not valuable to senior management and/or did not respond to a specific business IT need.

“We’ve witnessed a change in mind-set, execution and delivery of EA. The value of EA is not in simply ‘doing EA’, but rather in how it can help evolve the business and enable senior executives to respond to business threats and opportunities.”

Brian Burke’s statements are echoed across the industry. Enterprise architecture has got to become more about business outcomes and the deliverables that steer an organization toward them.

Enterprise Architecture Deliverables

Gartner have actually outlined the deliverables behind the wheel – categorizing five different deliverables that will aid in EAs delivering business value.

Measurable Deliverables – Deliverables that measure EAs direct impact on a business.

Actionable Deliverables – Deliverables that drive change in relation to business outcomes.

Diagnostic Deliverables – Analytic tools purposed for determining the knock on effects of business decisions.

Enabling Deliverables – The collected information (e.g. from performance metrics) that enable diagnostic deliverables. Essentially the basis on which the analysis in diagnostic deliverables is formed.

Operational Deliverables – Deliverables focused internally, on the EA teams themselves. They help define where an EA team is now and an outline of what should be done to move forward.

Just Enough Enterprise Architecture

Frameworks can still be implemented, however. But they should be implemented malleably, as opposed to being rigid as not to undermine EAs rule of best practice – “Just Enough” enterprise architecture .

“Just enough” enterprise architecture is an EA mantra for avoiding the problems that come with over analysis. Problems such as delayed decision making and missed opportunity thanks to a symptom colloquially dubbed “analysis paralysis.”

A deliverable/business outcome approach can help address which tangents are most important to the organization, and therefore indicate which is best to follow. Then, rather than doing everything in a blanket, one size fits all take on EA, enterprise architects can be far more precise, saving themselves time, and moving projects through the pipeline more quickly.

Business Outcome Driven EA and Alignment

A businesses outcome based approach to EA will also help align the business needs with the IT department as a whole. By focusing on what the business needs, you’ll be able to prime the IT & Technology services, as well as application portfolios in order to achieve what you set out to do in order to progress as departments, and the organization as a whole.

Business Outcome EA and Innovation

Innovation is becoming increasingly more important in business. It should now, ideally, permeate every inch of an organization both encouraging and enabling innovation indiscriminately across processes. Enterprise architecture is no different in this regard – there’s even a case for innovation being even more important to EA, as they administer the foundations in which to implement new ideas.

The business outcome approach to EA, can provide a platform upon which innovation can be carried out.

enterprise architecture business process

Categories
Enterprise Architecture erwin Expert Blog

How Does a Vanguard Enterprise Architect Manage Innovation?

We should move away from the ‘burden of innovation’ expression. Innovation is born of free thought, expression and creativity, and to label such a notion a ‘burden’ has always seemed a bizarre turn of phrase.

Of course, some people are naturally better at innovation than others, and those that struggle with the discipline may feel burdened with pressure if you demand innovation from them. But it’s unlikely that either employees or business leaders will feel oppressed by the notion that their good ideas will have a positive impact on the business.

Gartner: “By 2016, 30% of global organizations will establish a clear role distinction between Foundational and Vanguard Enterprise Architects.”

It’s for these reasons why Enterprise Architecture going forward, needs to adopt the Vanguard Enterprise Architect.

An innovation driver, the Vanguard enterprise architect deals with technology disruptions and enterprise connectivity; as opposed to the Foundational Enterprise Architect, who maintains enterprise technology and the systems of record.

Gone are the days whereby innovation is managed by a small group (i.e  a Research and Development team). We now welcome an era of collaboration, enabled by the speed and quality of communication the Internet can offer, and further enhanced by the Cloud.

With digital business, innovation should (and will) permeate every aspect of business – Enterprise Architecture included. In fact, Enterprise Architecture will arguably be the most imbued business department, due to their governance over steering innovation for the business as a whole.

EA’s will have to manage the current state of the business, but now the non-linear tasks attributed to digital business are also a duty. These are two very different responsibilities and therefore, not only warrant, but demand two clearly defined and distinguished roles.

Bimodal IT

Bimodal IT is a business mantra whereby an organization fundamentally acknowledges the separation between new and old IT. The reason for its inception, is the maturing role of IT within organizations. Over time, we can see that IT has evolved, indicating it’s taken on new responsibilities, but hasn’t shed the old ones.

It’s become more capable and more essential, and so the tasks IT departments have to carry out have grown, rather than changed. Bimodal is a method of acknowledging this evolution, and effectively coping with it.  This is why colloquially, bimodal IT has been summarized as having your cake (old IT) and eating it too (new).

It accounts for two ‘modes’. Mode 1 being the more traditional, responsible for “keeping the lights on” – the cost savings, efficiency improving, core tasks we’re used to from IT.

Mode 2 on the other hand, is responsible for ‘new IT’ tasks, like innovation and businesses more disruptive factors. Sound familiar?

That’s because bimodal IT is closely aligned with the idea of a Vanguard EA. In fact, for either to work at their full potential, both should be employed in tandem.

The separation between the two modes and the two roles shouldn’t get in the way though. With well actioned collaboration, organizations can ensure their processes are carried out in the open for the relevant parties.

If teams behind both modes, and Enterprise Architects occupying either role (Foundational or Vanguard) are aware of what one another are doing and even share resources in order to help one another, the system becomes frictionless. This effectively blurs the antithetic nature of the disciplines as in the end, everybody is still working towards bettering the business and it’s operations.

Bimodal Mode 1 and 2

The above shows the differences between the two modes. Most prominent perhaps, is the increased IT agility awarded by Mode 2. In an ever changing field such as digital business, agility should be a priority for any organization.

Benefits of Enterprise Architecture Tools in Bimodal IT

A good Enterprise Architecture tool (or digital business platform) can aid the alignment of the two modes. You’ll be able to clearly identify the different assets associated with the modes, as well as facilitate improved communication between the relevant parties.

The benefits don’t end here though.

With an efficient, agile EA tool, planning can becoming more accurate and reliable through the well applied use of roadmaps; you’ll be better equipped to understand the impact and costs of change; business and IT assets can be standardized so everyone is always on the same page – facilitating better communication; the traceability of objectives to projects will be improved, increasing visibility; and with all this in mind, collaboration between individuals and teams will benefit too. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

enterprise architecture business process

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Why Enterprise Architecture Needs Maturity Models

Walk before you run. We’ve heard it a million times, referencing almost as many different disciplines. Yet as time is limited, it’s often human nature to want to get things done quickly. However, much like our first steps, building a successful Enterprise Architecture practice is a process worked on and developed over time.

This is where a maturity model comes in. Maturity models are employed as a means for businesses to evaluate their current position, and therefore, better understand when it’s the right time to move forward and how to do so.

At the risk of a metaphor overstaying it’s welcome, consider this: buying your infant an expensive pair of runner’s shoes and expecting them to sprint is a misguided presumption at the very least. With the child clearly not ready to utilize them, there’s absolutely no way to justify the cost. You’re better off with a pair that are fit for purpose with the knowledge that they will be outgrown.

Maturity model use in enterprise architecture

Enterprise architecture (EA) can be viewed in the same light. If your enterprise architecture practice is newly established – the type of set-up that’s focused on reacting to issues as they arrive – you shouldn’t expect the team to immediately start delivering the work more associated with vanguard enterprise architects, who’re more focused on thinking forward, planning and innovating.

A maturity model is essentially a survey based framework, purposed for assessing IT capabilities. Capabilities including but not limited to operational efficiency and effectiveness. In short, the IT leaders in an organization complete a survey, and are awarded a score based on their answers.

However, the maturity model itself isn’t where organizations will find its value. It’s the knowledge gained from an organizations current position and insight from the model and it’s suggestions that gives the model its worth. Businesses can use this information to influence development roadmaps for their enterprise architecture practices, to better them going forward.

Gartner’s own EA maturity model generates generic, yet prescient suggestions for developing a practice. These suggestions are the cumulative understanding and judgment of some of the industry’s most trusted analysts.

However, organizations should tailor their development plans to themselves, as the nuances of their individual experience will rely on the organizations own business outcomes.

Perhaps the biggest benefit of a maturity model for the EA practice, is that it can help you better identify the right time to go bimodal, establish Vanguard Enterprise Architect roles or expand the team. This is important, as the current industry trajectory indicates that bimodal approaches to IT will be increasingly essential as digital business continues to expand across markets.

The different levels of the enterprise architecture maturity model

Gartner’s is by no means the only maturity model in the discipline. However, due to Gartner’s prevalence and status as an industry trusted source of analysis, their model is a fine point of focus for this discussion.

Their maturity model identifies five different levels of maturity within enterprise architecture practices. Ranging from an enterprise architecture structure that is “Non-Existent”, to one that is “Ubiquitous.”

They breakdown the five levels as such:

  • Level 1: Nonexistent — As it sounds.
    In this instance, enterprise architecture either hasn’t existed until this point, or is in its very early stages of implementation, and any enterprise architecture work that has been done, was almost certainly informal and off cuff.
  • Level 2: Reactive — In this instance, an enterprise architecture practice does exist, and is officially recognized by the organization. However, the nature of the practice is one of response, rather than preemptive planning and action. Because of this, work is still on an ad-hoc or off cuff basis, and can usually only promise short term fixes.
  • Level 3: Functioning — At this point, an enterprise architecture practice is now operating with business outcomes in mind. The Foundational Enterprise Architect is often well represented here. However, the organization isn’t necessarily prepared for a truly bi-modal EA set up, and might struggle with balance when bringing in some of the more Vanguard EA responsibilities into the fold.
  • Level 4: Integrated — At this stage, the enterprise architecture practice is delivering value, and consistently so. Vanguard EAs are clearly established and so the business can adopt a ‘true’ bimodal approach to its operations. This is where organizations should aim to reach at a minimum as here, an organization is delivering on business outcomes.
  • Level 5: Ubiquitous — Here, enterprise architectures success has a trickle down effect across the organization. EA becomes a natural way of working and the principles behind the discipline are widely adopted.

Gartner's maturity model for EA

The changing role of Enterprise Architects

Along the EA practice maturity journey, the enterprise architecture team tends to refocus at the different stages. Initially, the practices’ main focus is providing guidance – if you’re familiar with bimodal IT (you should be) you’ll know that this corresponds with ‘Mode 1’. Here enterprise architecture is predominantly concerned with answering specific questions about maximizing efficiency in processes, reducing complexities and helping to steer and implement development decisions.

The practice then moves towards a new focus, concentrating on delivering business outcomes. Enterprise Architects are responsible for laying out the structure behind the business strategy, and working towards and finding the business outcomes behind said strategy. At this point, EAs are also responsible for ensuring IT in general, stays aligned with the wider business.

Lastly, an enterprise architecture practice will occupy the space it arguably needs to be today. Practices are now tasked with supporting digital business – a concept that occupies a mass of consumer markets, and continues to infiltrate more. This is where enterprise architecture demands innovation, and why innovation management capable EA tools are a smart and valuable investment. Enterprise Architects are now responsible for creating new business opportunities, not just support in reaching their outcomes. This demands a different type of Enterprise Architect, and the introduction of a new ‘Mode’ (Mode 2) into the way the practice operates.

In each of these transitions, the previous is built upon rather than forgotten. This is where bimodal IT is so important when navigating the digital business environment. A mature enterprise architecture practice demands responsibilities for both ensuring “business as usual” and delivering business innovations.

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Innovation Management & Enterprise Architecture’s Role in Bimodal IT

Coasting and jogging was okay when IT was an agent of support. Infact, the intermediate pacing was ideal for the job, that required teams to operate and maintain mission-critical legacy infrastructure. But since the ascent of digital business, IT teams are now front and center and have garnered a new onus to innovate – and innovation is a sprint.

The problem is, IT’s old guard is far from retired and the support cogs still need to turn. Yet expecting a legacy/traditional IT team to take up the mantel of ‘new IT,’ is akin to substituting chalk for cheese at a dinner party for mice.

Enter bimodal. The technology equivalent of having your cake and eating it too. Bimodal IT is a Gartner-coined term and IT practice that fundamentally acknowledges the separation between new and old IT.

Bimodal IT – A Jog vs. A Sprint

The two (bi) modes couldn’t be more different – Mode 1 is more suited to the traditional, emphasizing scalability, efficiency, safety and accuracy. Whereas mode 2 is primed for non-sequential and often ad-hoc, emphasizing agility and speed.

A well executed bimodal IT practice seeks to blur the lines between the antitheses, and create a harmony between the teams.

Why Bimodal?

Industry adoption of bimodal practices is already evident. In a 2015 study, Gartner spoke to CIOs to determine their spending priorities for 2016. (Further reading: for CIOs 2016 concerns, click here)

They found that from a list of twelve, mode 2 occupied half of the list, and of the top three, mode 2 accounted for the number one and third spots respectively.

Bimodal IT Mode 1 and Mode 2

But adopting bimodal shouldn’t be solely down to industry trends – your business should adopt the practice on its own merit.

The reason being, is because bimodal is fundamentally intertwined with the DevOps and Agile Development philosophies – coupling rapid, evolutionary application and service development with IT operations and maintenance to deliver products on a rapid release cycle. This is an idea that resonates with organizations both big and small, as organizations across the board are already familiar with concepts such as Agile and Lean.

Implications of moving to Bimodal IT

This table shows the implications of IT moving to a bimodal setup. Remember, the overarching goal of Mode 1 is reliability, supporting the business critical applications, whilst the goal of Mode 2 is to enable the business and IT to act with agility in response to new opportunities and challenges.

Bimodal IT Comparison
Source: Gartner

Why decouple mode 1 and 2 in this way? Well, legacy systems are typically responsible for an organization’s most critical processes – managing critical data – and are valued for their reliability, availability and security. With these “brownfield” environments, it is far too complex and risky to experiment with innovative new ideas and introduce cloud services.

Where does Enterprise Architecture fit in?

Enterprise Architecture (EA) helps in several key ways. Firstly, in identifying your Mode 1 and Mode 2 assets; but also in improving communication throughout the organization, building accurate models and roadmaps, understanding the impact of change and identifying the real costs.

Additionally, EA helps in increasing project success and reliability, standardizing business and IT assets, and in traceability of objectives to projects for increased visibility.

It’s nearly impossible to experiment with innovative application development tools and cloud services on brownfield environments: the IT equivalent of spaghetti code, a byzantine tangle of systems, software and support personnel.

Instead, the bimodal approach identifies areas where IT has less to lose, but large potential gains, by using iterative development, new software tools and public cloud services. Many times, even the business model for an emergent IT service isn’t well understood and subject to rapid, market- and user-driven change. Here, it’s far better to have development and IT operations’ processes with the smallest possible overhead.

While the tortoise wins the slow, steady marathons, the hare is far better on an unpredictable course full of twists and turns.

Defining Mode 1 dependencies

To understand Mode 1 dependencies in your enterprise architecture, you should ask yourself questions such as:

  • What are the key systems?
  • What affect do they have on key processes?
  • Which locations are impacted?
  • Which organizations and roles are responsible?
  • What data is affected?
  • Is there any technology required?
  • Which business capabilities are affected?

One way to identify Mode 1 EA concepts is by querying relevant attributes. For example: all Business Processes that have high criticality AND all Applications that are supporting critical business processes. Applying this type of query to your EA models helps you visualize the assets and their relationships.

Identify Mode 2 candidates

To identify Mode 2 assets in your enterprise architecture you should identify concepts with low to medium Risk attributes, and high or relatively high Organizational Value attributes.

Enterprise Architecture Risk attributes

Running this query on your architecture models helps you visualize assets that fit Mode 2 IT approach. An example of this is shown below:

Mode 2 Visualization

Different viewpoints, such as circular diagrams, can then help you better understand the relationships between your concepts.

Mode 2 Circular Visualization model

Introducing an Innovation Management process

A managed innovation process feeding into your enterprise architecture workstreams acts as a mechanism for discovering the opportunities associated with Mode 2 assets. You can see in this framework, new ideas and initiatives (in the upper-left) relate to overall approach.

Ideas in Enterprise Architecture Process

Innovation Goals and Campaigns

Campaigns are an effective tool in focusing innovation/ideation efforts around an objective or goal. But how do you know where to focus first?

Our recommended approach is to target the “low hanging fruit” that you’ve identified by classifying Mode 2 assets. These efforts can then be aligned to the CIO’s goals with the use of Business Capability Maps and Motivation models.

In this example, you can see that the concept called Claim Management is both a Mode 2 technology priority and is connected on the Motivation view.

Innovation Business Capability Map

Innovation Goal Model

In Summary

A strategic planning lifecycle can support a bimodal approach to enterprise architecture. Businesses should use traditional enterprise architecture to identify Mode 1 dependencies and Mode 2 dependencies, answering questions such as: “What attributes make Mode 1 assets for you?”

Additionally, organizations should command innovation management to look at opportunities for Mode 2 assets. This way, business leaders can discover and focus innovation on areas of the business/architecture that carry less risk but considerable value.

A firm grasp of these principles can be the difference in adopting a truly bimodal approach, readying your business for the present market, whilst future proofing processes by enabling a truly Agile method of responding to change.

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Why Bimodal Enterprise Architecture Needs SaaS

You may have heard the term floating around. You may have even tried to adopt it already.

In any case, bimodal approaches to IT are steadily becoming the new normal, as new onus is placed on IT teams to be the forefront of business revolution, innovation and progression, rather than ‘just support’.

So what is bimodal IT?

Well if you go by Dave Aron of Gartner’s definition, it’s something to do with Samurais and Ninjas – which sounds highly impractical in a modern setting. Especially in business. But Aron may actually be on to something.

“Bimodal IT is not two-speed,” he said. “It’s about Samurais and ninjas. You don’t want an army of ninjas because it would be too chaotic, and you don’t want your innovation done by Samurais because it would be too boring. The end game is to recognize who your Samurais are and who are your ninjas and have them working together.”

IT Organizations will have a bimodal capability

Ninjas and Samurais rarely let me down in a metaphor, but in case you’re still not following, bimodal IT is all about recognizing that IT has grown.

It views IT as having two recognizable arms, or types. Type 1 being the traditional, stability and reducing overheads focused arm, while Type 2 takes up the mantle of modern IT expectations in agile organization and a focus on innovation, time-to-market and alignment – all among common the most common CIO struggles.

Bimodal IT is the recognition that IT is no longer a single purposed tool of support, and that it’s grown into a division of business with wider reaching responsibilities. It’s not two-speeds, it’s multi-pronged. Two business arms working separately, yet in tandem.

Bimodal IT in Enterprise Architecture

Today’s Enterprise Architects reflect the duality of bimodal IT. They fall into two identities, the foundational enterprise architects (EA) and the vanguard. The foundational EAs handle enterprise technology maintenance, and the vanguards drive innovation and tackle technology disruptions as they come. Sound familiar?

The vanguard evolution is largely down to the much increased weight on technology and digital business as a whole. This new market demands agility, innovation and the other vanguard EA attributes as fundamental system requirements.

So where does SaaS come in?

Well first of all, what is SaaS? Despite its homonymity, SaaS isn’t about snappy fingers and fierce attitudes. It stands for ‘Software as a Service,’ and as Gartner defines it, is “software that is owned, delivered and managed remotely by one or more providers.

“The provider delivers software based on one set of common code and data definitions that is consumed in a one-to-many model by all contracted customers at any time on a pay-for-use basis or as a subscription based on use metrics.”

In essence, SaaS is a modern take on leasing software, that shakes off the installation costs, upkeep costs, and other headaches (that often cost), associated with locally stored software.

Instead of running locally, stored on on-site hard drives and discs, SaaS systems operate in the cloud.

But much like new-age IT, SaaS isn’t just about reducing overheads – it’s also a key enabler in business agility.  The hosted nature means the relevant parties can all be updated in real-time, and acts as a fantastic facilitator to dialogue around suggestions and queries. This collaboration is crucial in being able to adjust, pivot and realign quickly in the face of disruption.

Enterprise Architects find SaaS particularly useful for these reasons. The ease of collaboratively modeling, roadmapping and effortless communications are positives that can’t be ignored.

All of this equates to a model that’s not only ‘agility-capable‘, but primed for such reasons, making it a perfect harmony to EAs new song.

SaaSy Bimodal IT

For many businesses, the SaaSy approach to IT is the only way to facilitate adopting bimodal IT. Many small-to-medium sized businesses (SMBs) don’t have the resources to action a truly bimodal approach in house. Between maintaining systems, and other tasks typical of traditional samurai IT, there simply isn’t enough time in the day to be ninja.

A transition to SaaS would transfer much of the burden of maintaining systems to a third party, and leave space for IT departments to work on revolutionizing, innovating and improving business operations, a staple of efficient bimodal IT.

This is great for SMBs, as they don’t have to worry about stretching resources, or expanding the IT team. Instead, they can simply repurpose their current IT team, into the Type 2 IT professionals of modern business.

We’re already seeing businesses catch on to this principle, with an industry swing towards cloud based solutions being backed up by solid research.

A Dimension Data-led study found that on site data storage is “fading into the category of legacy technology.” One of the reasons suggested, was the advances in quality and stability, making the cloud a more appealing option than it might have been in the past. But also cited, and perhaps more importantly, was setting up and maintaining a cloud system has a “much lower cost.”

Despite the data, and relatively transparent benefits – including but not limited to enabling bimodal IT and saving money – there’s still an air of concern surrounding SaaS and the ‘Cloud’ in some corners. The former certainly isn’t helped by its ‘Shadowy’ epithet – SaaS has been dubbed Shadow IT by industry insiders.

It implies ill, and well… Shadowy practices. The naming can be deemed unfortunate, though, as the wide adoption of the SaaS label shows the industry trying to shake the moniker.

That’s because Shadow IT isn’t, and has never been an Emporer Palpatine figure, pulling strings in the background as a nefarious, classical composer. Rather it’s ‘Shadowy’ in that it can exist in the background, without any thought. And when it comes to an organization’s systems, that’s really how it’s supposed to be.

It’s key to repurposing IT departments to function in this modern era. If your IT department’s only function is support, when many of the most profitable modern businesses not only prioritize IT, but actually base their core functions on tech, you’re going to fall behind.

And these are precisely the pains that SaaS can effectively iron out. Time and financial costs of maintaining systems are taken out of the equation, so what’s left over, can get the intention that it not only deserves, but that the current market demands.

Whether it’s producing and selling technology, or giving consumers new and easier ways to interact with the business and its various services, IT is front and center now, and should be valued as such.

Go SaaS, and your old, boring, samurai, suddenly have that extra wriggle room to be ninja.

Enterprise Architecture & Data Modeling White Paper

Categories
Enterprise Architecture erwin Expert Blog

Avoiding Analysis Paralysis With “Just Enough” Enterprise Architecture

In the past, analysis paralysis and enterprise architecture had gone hand in hand causing bottlenecks in new initiatives.

It’s natural that you want to be accurate and your work correct. But it’s very easy to become so focused on having every last detail 100% perfect, that it results in delayed decisions and business outcomes – or, “Analysis Paralysis”.

In this article we lay out actions that you can follow to help avoid analysis paralysis pitfalls using “just enough” enterprise architecture, and look at the tools and techniques available to build, analyze and communicate it effectively. First off, here’s a definition I think explains the concept quite well:

“Analysis paralysis or paralysis by analysis is an anti-pattern, the state of over-analyzing (or over-thinking) a situation so that a decision or action is never taken, in effect paralyzing the outcome.”

Set a decision deadline

In today’s business environment, the actions (or inactions) of an individual have an impact on those above, below and beside them. Determine the timeframe in which your analysis or recommendation MUST be completed to avoid a stalemate situation where others are waiting on you.

Enterprise Architecture specifics:

  • Set distinct timescales when defining architecture change
  • Set change around Time based, Goal Driven initiatives

Often organizations have long timescales for analysis and get embroiled in building complex models when what is really needed is to understand the objectives and key initiatives in the business. Once these are clearly understood then change campaigns can be designed to deliver an architecture that fits the business.

Ask colleagues/peers for a sanity check

Including others in your work process improves the likelihood of an effective outcome. Diversity of thought gives you a broader context by which to build, analyze and communicate information.

Enterprise Architecture specifics:

  • Incorporate ideation
  • Understand the key players and ask for them to collaborate directly in the process
  • Avoid building a model in isolation and then asking for comments and suggestion

Look to incorporate multiple stakeholders either directly or by using output from any IT innovation campaigns that exist within the business.

IT Innovation Campaign

Collaboration is about asking people to help directly in the architecture process. This is key to not over analyzing the model, but focus on what needs to be done. An example would be to collaborate directly with the security team should a model component have a security impact.

Don’t get lost in information/Don’t get lost in the detail

It can be easy to lose oneself in a rabbit hole of information. Whether that be out of an innate curiosity to learn, or a paranoia that there is significant, and increasingly important information just a little deeper.

It’s undoubtedly a tough cycle to crack. Yet it’s solution unfortunately draws a line between frustration and simplicity. That’s because, simply put, the answer is just strict self control and regulation. Limits should be set and adhered to, so that you can efficiently establish what you’re trying to understand in the present, and what you’d like to accomplish in the future.

Enterprise Architecture specifics:

  • Separate Enterprise Architecture from Solution Architecture, understand that detail does exist where Architecture meets design
  • Use a goal based decision process, keeps a focus on what needs to be built and by when
  • Concentrate upon interfaces / relationships
  • Define the core properties to be collected and implement quality checks
  • Harvest and connect to records of source

Avoid detail by focusing on how to make strategic changes rather than a focus on how a solution is going to be built. Thus, we should pay more attention to delivering capabilities, and not the configuration of solutions. This means we need to model by capability and look for high level architecture patterns.

Don’t wait for optimal decisions

Waiting on optimal decisions carries many of the same problems as getting lost in information. Whether or not a decision is optimal is completely subjective to circumstance.

Meaning that if you do wait, and the opportunity passes, you’re then waiting for the next horizon of peak opportunity, looking out for similar signs as before as to point it out. However, as you’ve waited, the likelihood is that the circumstances would have changed around you, meaning that those same indicators will no longer be relevant.

This creates a perpetual cycle of waiting – waiting… waiting. A better approach is to make decisions in optimal ‘moments’, quelling the stagnation of perpetual waiting. After all, decisions can be tweaked and changed in the future, it’s indecision that stays the same.

Enterprise Architecture specifics:

  • Use analytics and cost analysis driven by focus on desired outcome
  • Focus on goal based analysis
  • Just enough architecture to support an optimal decision at a point in time
  • Adopting a more agile approach to enterprise architecture, in order to adapt decisions in the future when required

Make optimal decisions based upon SMART objectives, focus on building the architecture to deliver the capability at a point in time. This is what is at the hub of just enough architecture.

Goals and capabilities should be broken down into components and we should focus on delivering an architecture to support them. A series of small iterations, whilst collaborating with the key people will build an actionable architecture. Use Kanban to manage the process, roadmaps to validate a particular solution against the required capabilities and goals.

Step towards a decision

One of the reasons people find making decisions so difficult, is the weight of the decision in question. For example, the decision to perform a 180° turn on a plan you’re currently actioning might seem infeasible. 18, incremental, 10° shifts? Not so much. Smaller decisions and the smaller shifts in action that they carry are a great way of wriggling out of analysis paralysis.

Enterprise Architecture specifics:

  • Understand the iterations required to build a solution
  • Kanban the iterations
  • Use impact analysis to reveal dependencies
  • Roadmap by goal and capability

Use all the tools available – Kanban to manage the process including collaboration, use diagram tools to see architectural dependencies, roadmap goals, capabilities, applications and infrastructure.

If we keep the models at a high level answering goal based questions then we can build just enough architecture.

Summary

The core purpose of Enterprise Architecture can be outlined as follows:

  • Aligning IT investments with business needs to increase their profitability
  • Highlighting weaker, less cost efficient areas of a business and amending them
  • Improve the decision making at executive level
  • Increasing the benefits from innovation
  • Delivering strategic change initiatives

(Source : Gartner)

What do we find? Complexity in presentation of data; detailed design models instead of stakeholder based outputs; and the mixing of Solution Architecture and Enterprise Architecture. Additionally, it can be impossible to make decisions unless you abstract upwards.

Doing just enough is a case of focusing on outcomes and not building detail. It means focusing on goals and how to address them. Incorporating existing Innovation initiatives.

Creating Capability based models to represent the business. Associating with Application and Technology layers to understand solution patterns rather than the exact solutions need to make key decisions.

Choosing to focus on just enough architecture that focuses on high value business outcomes, gives the architect the best chance to deliver the core purposes of EA. All this adds up to increasing time to market, and quite simply – less headaches.

enterprise architecture business process

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Gartner Recognizes Corso for its Agile & Affordable SaaS Based EA Tool

Leading tech analyst Gartner, has included Corso in their latest Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Architecture Tools report, as a digital business platform for small to medium sized businesses (SMBs). Although the Corso platform is well suited to accommodating large organizations, Gartner cite agile, user-friendly and structured approaches to enterprise architecture, as well as affordable pricing models, as a great tool to help cope with the gearing up in digital business.

Martin Owen, CEO at Corso understandably took pride at the acknowledgement.

“We’re excited about how Gartner are seeing the future of the EA market,” he said. “It’s an exciting time and one of rapid change where digital business is effecting the manner in which enterprise architects are used within organizations.

“Modern, Agile enterprise architecture tools such as ours address ideation and innovation through quick, lean and highly structured approaches to EA. Gartner also see that, as well as traditional organizations, the pricing and availability of SaaS makes these tools attractive to small and medium organizations.”

The analysts even went as far to say, that the importance of EA tools across the board is likely to increase in correlation with the digital business push, as stakeholders will place more emphasis on EA based planning, analysis and execution.

The claims are further substantiated by polls carried out by the world leaders in information technology research, with 59% of IT leaders agreeing, and that the emphasis on EA based planning will last at least through 2017.

Gartner expect businesses to leverage the numerous arms of digital business platforms, including modeling, ideation and innovation, and application portfolio management, among others. Leveraging these modules is a sure fire way for a business to position itself strategically to achieve it’s business outcomes.

Gartner also pointed out that the platform providers involved in the research, were all System as a Software based (SaaS/Cloud hosted). Some business owners might meet this with precaution, but the benefits of SaaS are far too prolific to ignore.

If you’re one of the aforementioned business owners, a best practice to consider, is to keep an eye out for data handling certifications such as ISO 27001, which indicate a company takes your data seriously, and has the necessary systems in place to maintain it.

“Corso are one of the only vendors to be ISO27001 certified which enables it to address cyber-security and data privacy risk concerns which in turn gives customers extra confidence in web and cloud based offerings.” – Martin Owen, CEO at Corso

Considering ITs refocusing on enterprise architecture and related disciplines, it’s worth then, looking into the likely reasons for the change.

The prime catalyst has to be technology’s main stage rival in business. Whether an organization’s commodities themselves are tech based, or the systems behind selling and support, technology and related departments have a lot more say in the day to day, and future running of a business.

Naturally, technology’s new position demands more attention. Previously, IT departments were centered around keeping on the lights, and cutting the costs behind keeping on said lights. Now those departments have to juggle traditional IT tasks, along with newer IT responsibilities such as innovation.

Additionally, digital business platforms have to be geared towards accommodating collaboration (sharing and cooperating on information), common repository and Agile, lean principles and iterative development.

That’s why Gartner are forecasting a new enterprise architecture and digital business platform push. And the businesses that catch on to the refined, and realigned focus of Agile EA in particular, will find it’s essential to coping with what for many, will be significant and daunting, yet essential change.

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

How Dedicated Enterprise Architecture Tools Solve Common CIO Problems

Thanks to the rise of technology’s importance in business, CIOs have found their job’s becoming increasing difficult. New problems and headaches are as consistent in showing up, as technology innovations themselves – and in an industry where the number of IoT devices is slated to increase by 285% (38.5 billion) by 2020, that’s no small task.

Yet, even with the constant influx of new ones, the same core issues seem to concern every CIO. The good news though, is that there are solutions, and this is how enterprise architecture, digital business platforms can help implement them.

Alignment of IT with the Business

It’s always been important for IT to be properly aligned with the business goals – from support, all the way to innovation.

In fact, this is and has been a core function for enterprise architecture (EA) for some time, and CIOs that recognize this have been benefiting from it. However, as the rate of technology change has and will continue to increase, the wider problem CIOs find with the alignment of IT and the business, is staying aligned.

Traditional enterprise architecture models have been adapted to quell this issue. Agile enterprise architecture is centered around being a more malleable, more transparent enterprise architecture set up. Being more welcoming of change, the new found agility is enhanced by collaboration systems that can insure the relevant parties to a business process are all in the know of both future improvements/changes, and current tasks.

IT Agility & Flexibility

As we touched on earlier, staying agile in such an ever changing market is essential.

This is one of the cases when CIOs with their head in the clouds, are actually more grounded than those without. Of course, in this case we’re talking tech, and naturally we mean the tech cloud, and not the metaphor for daydreaming.

Investments in CAPEX (money invested to buy fixed, physical assets) set ups are approaching legacy status, in that for most businesses they’ll no longer be a viable option.

Factors including the amount of data we need to store, the high costs (in time and money) of implementing physical storage structures, and the relatively low costs (again, in time and money) of implementing Software as a Service or, OPEX systems, the former no longer makes any sense.

Software as a Service (SaaS) systems are agile from the ground up. Their subscription model means you can pay for what you’re using and walk away when you’re done or find a provider more suited to your needs elsewhere. Additionally, their decentralized, hosted nature allows them to be updated on the fly without wasting resources on the businesses end. Win, win.

In this day and age, staying agile demands an efficient ‘bimodal approach’ to IT. To elaborate, think of traditional IT, the IT that keeps the lights on, the systems ticking and whose main goal is often reducing costs, as mode 1. When the new look IT – or mode 2 – is factored in, the one that has been called to the forefront of an organization, to cope with the digital heavy nature of modern business; and the one that demands innovation from its members to lead the business forward, we call this approach ‘bimodal’.

As some companies don’t have the resources for their IT departments and teams to juggle both modes, SaaS is essential to new IT’s success. Paired with enterprise architecture, SaaS can be very useful indeed. For a start, both enable and promote collaboration across the business through their interconnectivity.

For example, the set up allows processes such as modeling, and roadmapping to be opened up, letting the relevant bodies easily work together to create them, whilst simultaneously keeping those that need to know, in the know, even when change comes suddenly.

Business Agility & Flexibility

Similarly to concerns over IT’s agility and flexibility, the agility and flexibility of the businesses itself is another top concern of CIOs. Businesses need to change, and pivot to stay relevant. In radical cases, this can be at a rate of near-moments notice.

Since IT is so integral to a business’s systems and processes, IT often has to pivot with the rest of the business too. In fact, it often has to pivot first to ensure the rest of the business is ready.

This is why business agility and flexibility is so important to CIOs, as rushed last minute changes are clearly not ideal, and ideally avoidable. To get around this, CIOs should implement collaborative and transparent procedures across the business, so that relevant parties are aware in advance of changes, and to an extent, collaboratively involved in the decision making process.

Kanban Board

Digital business platforms, enterprise architecture and innovation management solutions that support collaboration through discussion systems, kanban boards and other modules are well-suited for this purpose.

The interconnectivity they promote means anybody, and potentially everybody can be updated on processes in real time. This is critical to enforcing efficient decision making, and those decisions, as well as thoughtful planning, are key to maintaining an agile business.

Innovation

A study into business elements that typically concern CIOs, placed much weight on this point. Innovation hasn’t always been a core IT objective, but as IT has largely graduated from “just support,” the need for innovation has graduated with it. So much so, that the study even claimed that, “when successfully achieved, innovation has the ability to achieve both revenue growth and cost reduction. In fact, innovation can help with just about all of the IT management issues.”

We’ve touched on this issue before, even calling for the idea of a CIO to be repurposed from the Chief of “Information,” to “Innovation.” The mistake many people make, is assuming innovation is only about bringing new ideas and products to market. However, in the scheme of things, internal innovation in processes, structure and how teams operate is arguably just as, if not more important, as it must be done more consistently than the former.

Yet, in a global 2015 study by the Business Performance Innovation Network, only two in five business managers think their IT teams “do a good job at helping them become more strategic, responsive or valued as a business partner.”

Of 250 global business managers surveyed in 2015 by the Business Performance Innovation Network, less than half believe the level of innovation in their companies is good or very high, and “only two in five think their IT groups do a good job at helping them become more strategic, responsive or valued as a business partner.”

This isn’t necessarily because innovation in IT is being ignored (although in some cases it is), it’s more that the innovation is there, just without good management.

Enterprise architecture teams, along with innovation management, have a role to play here. Innovation management can be leveraged via pairwise comparisons and other modules to more accurately determine the best course for the innovation process.

Pairwise comparison
Innovation pairwise comparison

Additionally, business cases and transitional plans should be created, so that when new ideas are formed, they are executed efficiently. The benefits of using enterprise architecture and innovation management in tandem are straightforward enough, but by no means should this be grounds for them to be undervalued. Simply put, the combination means every good idea comes with an understanding of how to implement it.

Enterprise Architecture & Data Modeling White Paper