Tag: data governance 1.0 vs data governance 2.0

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Defining DG: What Can Data Governance Do for You?

Data governance (DG) is becoming more commonplace because of data-driven business, yet defining DG and putting into sound practice is still difficult for many organizations.

Defining DG

The absence of a standard approach to defining DG could be down to its history of missed expectations, false starts and negative perceptions about it being expensive, intrusive, impeding innovation and not delivering any value. Without success stories to point to, the best way of doing and defining DG wasn’t clear.

On the flip side, the absence of a standard approach to defining DG could be the reason for its history of lacklustre implementation efforts, because those responsible for overseeing it had different ideas about what should be done.

Therefore, it’s been difficult to fully fund a data governance initiative that is underpinned by an effective data management capability. And many organizations don’t distinguish between data governance and data management, using the terms interchangeably and so adding to the confusion.

Defining DG: The Data Governance Conundrum

While research indicates most view data governance as “critically important” or they recognize the value of data, the large percentage without a formal data governance strategy in place indicates there are still significant teething problems.

How Important is Data Governance

And that’s the data governance conundrum. It is essential but unwanted and/or painful.

It is a complex chore, so organizations have lacked the motivation to start and effectively sustain it. But faced with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other compliance requirements, they have been doing the bare minimum to avoid the fines and reputational damage.

And arguably, herein lies the problem. Organizations look at data governance as something they have to do rather than seeing what it could do for them.

Data governance has its roots in the structure of business terms and technical metadata, but it has tendrils and deep associations with many other components of a data management strategy and should serve as the foundation of that platform.

With data governance at the heart of data management, data can be discovered and made available throughout the organization for both IT and business stakeholders with approved access. This means enterprise architecture, business process, data modeling and data mapping all can draw from a central metadata repository for a single source of data truth, which improves data quality, trust and use to support organizational objectives.

But this “data nirvana” requires a change in approach to data governance. First, recognizing that Data Governance 1.0 was made for a different time when the volume, variety and velocity of the data an organization had to manage was far lower and when data governance’s reach only extended to cataloging data to support search and discovery. 

Data Governance Evolution

Modern data governance needs to meet the needs of data-driven business. We call this adaptation “Evolving DG.” It is the journey to a cost-effective, mature, repeatable process that permeates the whole organization.

The primary components of Evolving DG are:

  • Evaluate
  • Plan
  • Configure
  • Deliver
  • Feedback

The final step in such an evolution is the implementation of the erwin Enterprise Data Governance Experience (EDGE) platform.

The erwin EDGE places data governance at the heart of the larger data management suite. By unifying the data management suite at a fundamental level, an organization’s data is no longer marred by departmental and software silos. It brings together both IT and the business for data-driven insights, regulatory compliance, agile innovation and business transformation.

It allows every critical piece of the data management and data governance lifecycle to draw from a single source of data truth and ensure quality throughout the data pipeline, helping organizations achieve their strategic objectives including:

  • Operational efficiency
  • Revenue growth
  • Compliance, security and privacy
  • Increased customer satisfaction
  • Improved decision-making

To learn how you can evolve your data governance practice and get an EDGE on your competition, click here.

Solving the Enterprise Data Dilemma

Categories
erwin Expert Blog Data Governance

The Top Five Data Governance Use Cases and Drivers

As the applications for data have grown, so too have the data governance use cases. And the legacy, IT-only approach to data governance, Data Governance 1.0, has made way for the collaborative, enterprise-wide Data Governance 2.0.

In addition to increasing data applications, Data Governance 1.0’s decline is being hastened by recurrent failings in its implementation. Leaving it to IT, with no input from the wider business, ignores the desired business outcomes and the opportunities to contribute to and speed their accomplishment. Lack of input from the departments that use the data also causes data quality and completeness to suffer.

So Data Governance 1.0 was destined to fail in yielding a significant return. But changing regulatory requirements and mega-disruptors effectively leveraging data has spawned new interest in making data governance work.

The 2018 State of Data Governance Report indicates that 98% of organizations consider data governance important. Furthermore, 66% of respondents say that understanding and governing enterprise assets has become more or very important for their executives.

Below, we consider the primary data governance use cases and drivers as outlined in this report.

The Top 5 Data Governance Use Cases

1. Changing Regulatory Requirements

Changing regulations are undoubtedly the biggest driver for data governance. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will soon take effect, and it’s the first attempt at a near-global, uniform approach to regulating the way organizations use and store data.

Data governance is mandatory under the new law, and failure to comply will leave organizations liable for huge fines – up to €20 million or 4% of the company’s global annual turnover. For context, GDPR fines could wipe off two percentage points of revenue from Google parent company, Alphabet.

Although 60% of the organizations surveyed for the State of DG Report indicate that regulatory compliance is the key driver for implementing data governance, only 6% of enterprises are prepared for GDPR with less than four months to go.

But data governance use cases go beyond just compliance.

2. Customer Satisfaction

Another primary driver for data governance is improving customer satisfaction, with 49% of our survey respondents citing it.

A Data Governance 2.0 approach is paramount to this use case and should be strong justification to secure C-level buy-in. In fact, the correlation between effective data governance and customer satisfaction is clear. A 2017 report from Aberdeen Group shows that the user-base of organizations with more effective data governance programs are far happier with:

  • The business’ ability to share data (66% – Data Governance Leaders vs. 21% Data Governance followers)
  • Data systems’ ease of use (64% vs. 24%)
  • Speed of information delivery (61% vs. 18%)

3. Decision-Making

Another data governance use case as indicated by the State of DG Report is improved decision-making. Forty-five percent of respondents identify it as the third key driver, and for good reason.

Data governance success manifests itself as well-defined data that is consistent throughout the business, understood across departments, and used to pull the business in the desired direction. It also improves the quality of the data.

By moving data governance out of its IT silo, the employees responsible for business outcomes are part of its governance. This collaboration makes data both more discoverable, more insightful and more contextual.

The decision-making process becomes more efficient, as the velocity at which data can be interpreted increases. The organization can also better interpret and trust the information it is using to determine course.

4. Reputation Management

In the survey behind the State of DG Report, 30% of respondents name reputation management as a driver for DG’s implementation.

We’ve seen it time and time again with high-profile data breaches inflicting the likes of Equifax, Uber and Yahoo. All were met with costly PR fallout. For example, Equifax’s breach had a price tag of $90 million, as of November 2017.

So the discrepancy between the 60% who cite regulatory compliance as a key driver and the 30% who cite reputation management as DG drivers is interesting. One could argue they are the same; both call for data governance to help prevent or at least limit damaging breaches.

The difference might come down to smaller businesses that believe they have less brand equity to maintain. They, as well as some of their larger counterparts, have taken a reactionary approach to data governance. But GDPR should now encourage more proactive data governance across the board.

In terms of data governance use cases for managing the risk of data breaches, consider that data governance, at a fundamental level, is about knowing where your data is, who’s responsible for it, and what it is supposed to be used for.

This understanding enables organizations to focus security spending on the areas of highest risk. Thus, they can take a more cost-effective but thorough approach to risk management.

5. Analytics and Big Data

Analytics and Big Data also were identified as key drivers for data governance among 27% and 20% of respondents, respectively.

The need for data governance in these cases is largely driven by the amount of data businesses are now tasked with overseeing. In terms of volume, Big Data speaks for itself. Twenty-two percent of respondents in the State of DG Report manage more than 10 petabytes of data, which lines up closely with those who identify Big Data as a key driver.

However, the amount of data the average organization without a Big Data strategy consumes, stores and processes has climbed considerably in recent years.

Research indicates that 90% of the world’s data has been created just in the last two years. Globally, we generate 2.5 quintillion bytes a day. Other studies equate data’s value to that of oil, so clearly there’s a lot of value to be found.

However, the “three Vs of data” (volume, velocity, variety) tend to be positively correlated. When one increases, so do the other two. Higher volumes of data mean higher velocities of data that must be processed faster for worthwhile, valuable insights. It also means an increase in the data types – both structured and unstructured – which makes processing more difficult.

A Strong DG Foundation

A strong data governance foundation ensures data is more manageable, and therefore more valuable.

With Data Governance 2.0, data governance use cases shift from reactionary to proactive with a clear focus on business outcomes.

Although new regulations can be seen as bureaucratic and cumbersome, GDPR actually presents organizations with great opportunity – at least for those that choose to take the evolved Data Governance 2.0 path. They will benefit from an outcome-focused DG initiative that adds value beyond just regulatory compliance.

To learn more, download the complete State of Data Governance Report.

2020 Data Governance and Automation Report

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

The Key to Improving Business and IT Alignment

Fostering business and IT alignment has become more important than ever.

Gone are the days when IT was a fringe department, resigned to providing support. But after so long on the sidelines, many businesses still struggle to bring IT into the fold, ensuring its alignment with the wider business. But this should be a priority for any data-driven enterprise.

On a fundamental level, it requires a change of perception and culture. The stereotype of basement-housed IT teams was widely acknowledged and satirized. It formed the basis of the popular British sitcom The IT Crowd, which focused on the escapades of three IT staff members in the dingy basement of a huge corporation. Often their best professional input was “turn it off and on again.”

Today, the idea of such a small IT team supporting a huge business is almost too ridiculous to satirize..

Bring IT Out of the Basement

In the age of data-driven business, IT now takes center stage. And it has been promoted out of the basement – at least in principle.

Although IT has moved away from its legacy of support and “keeping the lights on,” many businesses still have a long way to go in fostering business and IT alignment.

But the data-driven nature of modern business demands it. Not only is the wider business responsible for understanding, making use of and capitalizing on data; the business as a whole, including IT, is responsible for upholding the regulations associated with it.

Fostering Business and IT Alignment

The key here, then, is a collaborative data governance program. For business and IT to be sufficiently aligned, the business needs access to all the data relevant to its various departments, whenever it is needed.

This means the right data of the right quality, regardless of format or where it is stored, must be available for use, but only by the right people for the right purpose.

Therefore, the notion that IT can manage and govern data independently is unthinkable. It’s the business that will use data the most, and it’s the business that stands to lose the most when decisions are made based on bad data.

Companies had long neglected this reality. Past efforts to implement data governance programs (Data Governance 1.0) often fell short in adding value. When left solely to IT, Data Governance 1.0 was solely focussed on cataloging data. This, and the disparity between IT and the business meant the meaning of data assets, and their relationship within the wider data landscape, was unclear.

This is what Data Governance 2.0, and its innately collaborative nature aims to resolve. With Data Governance 2.0, the strategy encompasses defined business, IT and business-IT requirements.

Data Governance for Business and IT Alignment

Business Requirements: The business is responsible for defining data, including setting standards for the ownership and meaning of data assets so the organization can use data with a uniformed approach.

IT Requirements: IT manages data at the base level: from mapping data – which may exist across various systems, reports and data models – to physical data assets (databases, files, documents and so on). This, in turn, enables IT to accurately assume the impact of things like data-glossary changes across the enterprise. That’s a key enabling factor in enterprise architecture, allowing for cost-effective and thorough risk management by identifying data points that require the most security.

Business-IT Requirements: A joint effort allows IT to effectively publish data to relevant roles/people. This way, the business can readily use data that is meaningful and relevant to it across various departments, while maintaining compliance with existing and upcoming data protection regulations.

Additionally, those using data can follow data chains back to the source, providing a wider, less ambiguous view of data assets and thus reducing the likelihood of poor decision-making.

For more best practices in business and IT alignment, and successfully implementing data governance, click here.

Business and IT alignment - Data governance

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Data Governance 2.0: Collaborative Data Governance

Data Governance 1.0 has been too isolated to be truly effective, and so a new, collaborative data governance approach is necessary.

This rings especially true when considering the imminent implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Compliance is required from all EU-based companies and those trading with the EU.

It’s extremely likely that your business falls under GDPR’s scope. Failure to comply will leave your company liable for penalties up to €20 million or 4% or annual global turnover – whichever is greater.

With the amount of data a modern business has to manage, and the copious access points, GDPR compliance will require everyone to sing from the same hymn sheet.

This is where Data Governance 2.0 comes in. As defined by Forrester, it is “an agile approach to data governance focused on just enough controls for managing risk, which enables broader and more insightful use of data required by the evolving needs of an expanding business ecosystem.”

The principles of Data Governance 2.0 were designed with modern, data-driven business in mind. This new approach acknowledges the demand for collaborative data governance, tears down organizational silos, and spreads responsibilities across more roles.

Collaborative Data Governance

Collaborative Data Governance – Shattering Silos

As addressed above, modern businesses must deal with volumes of data that legacy systems and policies just weren’t designed to manage. This problem is exacerbated by the variety of data, both structured and unstructured, historically managed by different departments within an organization.

To shatter such silos, organizations can leverage a collaborative data governance approach to foster better data use and accountability. A governance tool that can sort, regulate and manage data access through secure checkpoints and assigned roles is key. Then the right data of the right quality, regardless or format or location, is available to the right people for the right purpose.

Such a data governance tool is paramount not only to help ensure GDPR compliance but also for effective business operations. It’s important to stress that data governance is a key revenue driver.

In this digital age, data is more valuable than oil. But as with oil, it must be refined.

Collaborative Data Governance – The Data Refinery

Data Governance 1.0 was mainly concerned with cataloging data to support search and discovery. However, it fell short in adding value because it neglected the meaning of data assets and their relationships within the wider data landscape.

Many of the IT professionals involved in data governance recognized this, but calls for business leaders to be more active in governance often fell on deaf ears. Now that data has become a more critical business asset, we’re starting to see a shift.

Collaborative data governance encourages involvement throughout the organizational hierarchy. This is especially important now that business leaders, from CMOs to CTOs, are intrinsically involved in data management on a day-to-day basis.

As the best placed individuals in an organization to advocate and implement change, bringing ranking business leaders into the fold helps inform and enable the effort’s return on investment – both in limiting data exposures and driving new opportunities.

In the case of the CMO, data analysis might indicate that email open rates exceed targets, but click-through rates are underperforming. The CMO then can adjust content strategy to provide prospects with more relevant information and calls to action.

To learn more about collaborative data governance and the tool to foster this approach, click here.

Data governance is everyone's business