Tag: data trust

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Financial Services Data Governance: Helping Value ‘the New Currency’

For organizations operating in financial services data governance is becoming increasingly more important. When financial services industry board members and executives gathered for EY’s Financial Services Leadership Summit in early 2018, data was a major topic of conversation.

Attendees referred to data as “the new oil” and “the new currency,” and with good reason. Financial services organizations, including banks, brokerages, insurance companies, asset management firms and more, collect and store massive amounts of data.

But data is only part of the bigger picture in financial services today. Many institutions are investing heavily in IT to help transform their businesses to serve customers and partners who are quickly adopting new technologies. For example, Gartner research expects the global banking industry will spend $519 billion on IT in 2018.

The combination of more data and technology and fewer in-person experiences puts a premium on trust and customer loyalty. Trust has long been at the heart of the financial services industry. It’s why bank buildings in a bygone era were often erected as imposing stone structures that signified strength at a time before deposit insurance, when poor management or even a bank robbery could have devastating effects on a local economy.

Trust is still vital to the health of financial institutions, except today’s worst-case scenario often involves faceless hackers pillaging sensitive data to use or re-sell on the dark web. That’s why governing all of the industry’s data, and managing the risks that comes with collecting and storing such vast amounts of information, is increasingly a board-level issue.

The boards of modern financial services institutions understand three important aspects of data:

  1. Data has a tremendous amount of value to the institution in terms of helping identify the wants and needs of customers.
  2. Data is central to security and compliance, and there are potentially severe consequences for organizations that run afoul of either.
  3. Data is central to the transformation underway at many financial institutions as they work to meet the needs of the modern customer and improve their own efficiencies.

Data Management and Data Governance: Solving the Enterprise Data Dilemma

Data governance helps organizations in financial services understand their data. It’s essential to protecting that data and to helping comply with the many government and industry regulations in the industry. But financial services data governance – all data governance in fact – is about more than security and compliance; it’s about understanding the value and quality of data.

When done right and deployed in a holistic manner that’s woven into the business processes and enterprise architecture, data governance helps financial services organizations better understand where their data is, where it came from, its value, its quality, and how the data is accessed and used by people and applications.

Financial Services Data Governance: It’s Complicated

Financial services data governance is getting increasingly complicated for a number of reasons.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Deloitte’s 2018 Banking and Securities M&A Outlook described 2017 as “stuck in neutral,” but there is reason to believe the market picks up steam in 2018 and beyond, especially when it comes to financial technology (or fintech) firms. Bringing in new sets of data, new applications and new processes through mergers and acquisitions creates a great deal of complexity.

The integrations can be difficult, and there is an increased likelihood of data sprawl and data silos. Data governance not only helps organizations better understand the data, but it also helps make sense of the application portfolios of merging institutions to discover gaps and redundancies.

Regulatory Environment

There is a lengthy list of regulations and governing bodies that oversee the financial services industry, covering everything from cybersecurity to fraud protection to payment processing, all in an effort to minimize risk and protect customers.

The holistic view of data that results from a strong data governance initiative is becoming essential to regulatory compliance. According to a 2017 survey by erwin, Inc. and UBM, 60 percent of organizations said compliance drives their data governance initiatives.

More Partnerships and Networks

According to research by IBM, 45 percent of bankers say partnerships and alliances help improve their agility and competitiveness. Like consumers, today’s financial institutions are more connected than ever before, and it’s no longer couriers and cash that are being transferred in these partnerships; it’s data.

Understanding the value, quality and risk of the data shared in these alliances is essential – not only to be a good partner and derive a business benefit from the relationship, but also to evaluate whether or not an alliance or partnership makes good business sense.

Financial Services Data Governance

More Sources of Data, More Touch Points

Financial services institutions are at the forefront of the multi-channel customer experience and have been for years. People do business with institutions by phone, in person, via the Web, and using mobile devices.

All of these touch points generate data, and it is essential that organizations can tie them all together to understand their customers. This information is not only important to customer service, but also to finding opportunities to grow relationships with customers by identifying where it makes sense to upsell and cross-sell products and services.

Grow the Business, Manage the Risk

In the end, financial services organizations need to understand the ways their data can help grow the business and manage risk. Data governance plays an important role in both.

Financial services data governance can better enable:

  • The personalized, self-service, applications customers want
  • The machine learning solutions that automate decision-making and create more efficient business processes
  • Faster and more accurate identification of cross-sell and upsell opportunities
  • Better decision-making about the application portfolio, M&A targets, M&A success and more

If you’re interested in financial services data governance, or evaluating new data governance technologies for another industry, you can schedule a demo of erwin’s data mapping and data governance solutions.

Data Mapping Demo CTA

And you also might want to download our latest e-book, Solving the Enterprise Data Dilemma.

Michael Pastore is the Director, Content Services at QuinStreet B2B Tech.

Categories
erwin Expert Blog Data Governance Data Intelligence

Demystifying Data Lineage: Tracking Your Data’s DNA

Getting the most out of your data requires getting a handle on data lineage. That’s knowing what data you have, where it is, and where it came from – plus understanding its quality and value to the organization.

But you can’t understand your data in a business context much less track data lineage, its physical existence and maximize its security, quality and value if it’s scattered across different silos in numerous applications.

Data lineage provides a way of tracking data from its origin to destination across its lifespan and all the processes it’s involved in. It also plays a vital role in data governance. Beyond the simple ability to know where the data came from and whether or not it can be trusted, there’s an element of statutory reporting and compliance that often requires a knowledge of how that same data (known or unknown, governed or not) has changed over time.

A platform that provides insights like data lineage, impact analysis, full-history capture, and other data management features serves as a central hub from which everything can be learned and discovered about the data – whether a data lake, a data vault or a traditional data warehouse.

In a traditional data management organization, Excel spreadsheets are used to manage the incoming data design, what’s known as the “pre-ETL” mapping documentation, but this does not provide any sort of visibility or auditability. In fact, each unit of work represented in these ‘mapping documents’ becomes an independent variable in the overall system development lifecycle, and therefore nearly impossible to learn from much less standardize.

The key to accuracy and integrity in any exercise is to eliminate the opportunity for human error – which does not mean eliminating humans from the process but incorporating the right tools to reduce the likelihood of error as the human beings apply their thought processes to the work.

Data Lineage

Data Lineage: A Crucial First Step for Data Governance

Knowing what data you have and where it lives and where it came from is complicated. The lack of visibility and control around “data at rest” combined with “data in motion,” as well as difficulties with legacy architectures, means organizations spend more time finding the data they need rather than using it to produce meaningful business outcomes.

Organizations need to create and sustain an enterprise-wide view of and easy access to underlying metadata, but that’s a tall order with numerous data types and data sources that were never designed to work together and data infrastructures that have been cobbled together over time with disparate technologies, poor documentation and little thought for downstream integration. So the applications and initiatives that depend on a solid data infrastructure may be compromised, resulting in faulty analyses.

These issues can be addressed with a strong data management strategy underpinned by technology that enables the data quality the business requires, which encompasses data cataloging (integration of data sets from various sources), mapping, versioning, business rules and glossaries maintenance and metadata management (associations and lineage).

An automated, metadata-driven framework for cataloging data assets and their flows across the business provides an efficient, agile and dynamic way to generate data lineage from operational source systems (databases, data models, file-based systems, unstructured files and more) across the information management architecture; construct business glossaries; assess what data aligns with specific business rules and policies; and inform how that data is transformed, integrated and federated throughout business processes – complete with full documentation.

Centralized design, immediate lineage and impact analysis, and change-activity logging means you will always have answers readily available, or just a few clicks away. Subsets of data can be identified and generated via predefined templates, generic designs generated from standard mapping documents, and pushed via ETL process for faster processing via automation templates.

With automation, data quality is systemically assured and the data pipeline is seamlessly governed and operationalized to the benefit of all stakeholders. Without such automation, business transformation will be stymied. Companies, especially large ones with thousands of systems, files and processes, will be particularly challenged by a manual approach. And outsourcing these data management efforts to professional services firms only increases costs and schedule delays.

With erwin Mapping Manager, organizations can automate enterprise data mapping and code generation for faster time-to-value and greater accuracy when it comes to data movement projects, as well as synchronize “data in motion” with data management and governance efforts.

Map data elements to their sources within a single repository to determine data lineage, deploy data warehouses and other Big Data solutions, and harmonize data integration across platforms. The web-based solution reduces the need for specialized, technical resources with knowledge of ETL and database procedural code, while making it easy for business analysts, data architects, ETL developers, testers and project managers to collaborate for faster decision-making.

Data Lineage

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Why Data Governance is the Key to Better Decision-Making

The ability to quickly collect vast amounts of data, analyze it, and then use what you’ve learned to help foster better decision-making is the dream of many a business executive. But like any number of things that can be summarized in a single sentence, it’s much harder to execute on such a vision than it might first appear.

According to Forrester, 74 percent of firms say they want to be “data-driven,” but only 29 percent say they are good at connecting analytics to action. Consider this: Forrester found that business satisfaction with analytics dropped by 21 percent between 2014 and 2015 – a period of great promise and great investment in Big Data. In other words, the more data businesses were collecting and mining, the less happy they were with their analytics.

A number of factors are potentially at play here, including the analytics software, the culture of the business, and the skill sets of the people using the data. But your analytics applications and the conclusions you draw from your analysis are only as good as the data that is collected and analyzed. Collecting, safeguarding and mining large amounts of data isn’t an inexpensive exercise, and as the saying goes, “garbage in, garbage out.”

“It’s a big investment and if people don’t trust data, they won’t use things like business intelligence tools because they won’t have faith in what they tell them,” says Danny Sandwell, director of product marketing at erwin, Inc.

Using data to inform business decisions is hardly new, of course. The modern idea of market research dates back to the 1920s, and ever since businesses have collected, analyzed and drawn conclusions from information they draw from customers or prospective customers.

The difference today, as you might expect, is the amount of data and how it’s collected. Data is generated by machines large and small, by people, and by old-fashioned market research. It enters today’s businesses from all angles, at lightning speed, and can, in many cases, be available for instant analysis.

As the volume and velocity of data increases, overload becomes a potential problem. Unless the business has a strategic plan for data governance, decisions around where the data is stored, who and what can access it, and how it can be used, becomes increasingly difficult to understand.

Not every business collects massive amounts of data like Facebook and Yahoo, but recent headlines demonstrate how those companies’ inability to govern data is harming their reputations and bottom lines. For Facebook, it was the revelation that the data of 87 million users was improperly obtained to influence the 2016 U. S. presidential election. For Yahoo, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) levied a $35 million fine for failure to disclose a data breach in a timely manner.

In both the Facebook and Yahoo cases, the misuse or failure to protect data was one problem. Their inability to quickly quantify the scope of the problem and disclose the details made a big issue even worse – and kept it in the headlines even longer.

The issues of data security, data privacy and data governance may not be top of mind for some business users, but these issues manifest themselves in a number of ways that affect what they do on a daily basis. Think of it this way: somewhere in all of the data your organization collects, a piece of information that can support or refute a decision you’re about to make is likely there. Can you find it? Can you trust it?

If the answer to these questions is “no,” then it won’t be easy for your organization to make data-driven decisions.

Better Decision-Making - Data Governance

Powering Better Decision-Making with Data Governance

Nearly half (45 percent) of the respondents to a November 2017 survey by erwin and UBM said better decision-making was one of the factors driving their data governance initiatives.

Data governance helps businesses understand what data they have, how good it is, where it is, and how it’s used. A lot of people are talking about data governance today, and some are putting that talk into action. The erwin/UBM survey found that 52 percent of respondents say data is critically important to their organization and they have a formal data governance strategy in place. But almost as many respondents (46 percent) say they recognize the value of data to their organization but don’t have a formal governance strategy.

Many early attempts at instituting data governance failed to deliver results. They were narrowly focused, and their proponents often had difficulty articulating the value of data governance to the organization, making it difficult to secure budget. Some organizations even understood data governance as a type of data security, locking up data so tightly that the people who wanted to use it to foster better decision-making had trouble getting access.

Issues of ownership also stymied early data governance efforts, as IT and the business couldn’t agree on which side was responsible for a process that affects both on a regular basis. Today, organizations are better equipped to resolve issues of ownership, thanks in large part to a new corporate structure that recognizes how important data is to modern businesses. Roles like chief data officer (CDO), which increasingly sits on the business side, and the data protection officer (DPO), are more common than they were a few years ago.

A modern data governance strategy works a lot like data itself – it permeates the business and its infrastructure. It is part of the enterprise architecture, the business processes, and it help organizations better understand the relationships between data assets using techniques like visualization. Perhaps most important, a modern approach to data governance is ongoing, because organizations and their data are constantly changing and transforming, so their approach to data governance can’t sit still.

As you might expect, better visibility into your data goes a long way toward using that data to make more informed decisions. There is, however, another advantage to the visibility offered by a holistic data governance strategy: it helps you better understand what you don’t know.

By helping businesses understand the areas where they can improve their data collection, data governance helps organizations continually work to create better data, which manifests itself in real business advantages, like better decision-making and top-notch customer experiences, all of which will help grow the business.

Michael Pastore is the Director, Content Services at QuinStreet B2B Tech. This content originally appeared as a sponsored post on http://www.eweek.com/.

Previous posts:

You can determine how effective your current data governance initiative is by taking erwin’s DG RediChek.

Take the DG RediChek

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Data Governance Tackles the Top Three Reasons for Bad Data

In modern, data-driven busienss, it’s integral that organizations understand the reasons for bad data and how best to address them. Data has revolutionized how organizations operate, from customer relationships to strategic decision-making and everything in between. And with more emphasis on automation and artificial intelligence, the need for data/digital trust also has risen. Even minor errors in an organization’s data can cause massive headaches because the inaccuracies don’t involve just one corrupt data unit.

Inaccurate or “bad” data also affects relationships to other units of data, making the business context difficult or impossible to determine. For example, are data units tagged according to their sensitivity [i.e., personally identifiable information subject to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)], and is data ownership and lineage discernable (i.e., who has access, where did it originate)?

Relying on inaccurate data will hamper decisions, decrease productivity, and yield suboptimal results. Given these risks, organizations must increase their data’s integrity. But how?

Integrated Data Governance

Modern, data-driven organizations are essentially data production lines. And like physical production lines, their associated systems and processes must run smoothly to produce the desired results. Sound data governance provides the framework to address data quality at its source, ensuring any data recorded and stored is done so correctly, securely and in line with organizational requirements. But it needs to integrate all the data disciplines.

By integrating data governance with enterprise architecture, businesses can define application capabilities and interdependencies within the context of their connection to enterprise strategy to prioritize technology investments so they align with business goals and strategies to produce the desired outcomes. A business process and analysis component enables an organization to clearly define, map and analyze workflows and build models to drive process improvement, as well as identify business practices susceptible to the greatest security, compliance or other risks and where controls are most needed to mitigate exposures.

And data modeling remains the best way to design and deploy new relational databases with high-quality data sources and support application development. Being able to cost-effectively and efficiently discover, visualize and analyze “any data” from “anywhere” underpins large-scale data integration, master data management, Big Data and business intelligence/analytics with the ability to synthesize, standardize and store data sources from a single design, as well as reuse artifacts across projects.

Let’s look at some of the main reasons for bad data and how data governance helps confront these issues …

Reasons for Bad Data

Reasons for Bad Data: Data Entry

The concept of “garbage in, garbage out” explains the most common cause of inaccurate data: mistakes made at data entry. While this concept is easy to understand, totally eliminating errors isn’t feasible so organizations need standards and systems to limit the extent of their damage.

With the right data governance approach, organizations can ensure the right people aren’t left out of the cataloging process, so the right context is applied. Plus you can ensure critical fields are not left blank, so data is recorded with as much context as possible.

With the business process integration discussed above, you’ll also have a single metadata repository.

All of this ensures sensitive data doesn’t fall through the cracks.

Reasons for Bad Data: Data Migration

Data migration is another key reason for bad data. Modern organizations often juggle a plethora of data systems that process data from an abundance of disparate sources, creating a melting pot for potential issues as data moves through the pipeline, from tool to tool and system to system.

The solution is to introduce a predetermined standard of accuracy through a centralized metadata repository with data governance at the helm. In essence, metadata describes data about data, ensuring that no matter where data is in relation to the pipeline, it still has the necessary context to be deciphered, analyzed and then used strategically.

The potential fallout of using inaccurate data has become even more severe with the GDPR’s implementation. A simple case of tagging and subsequently storing personally identifiable information incorrectly could lead to a serious breach in compliance and significant fines.

Such fines must be considered along with the costs resulting from any PR fallout.

Reasons for Bad Data: Data Integration

The proliferation of data sources, types, and stores increases the challenge of combining data into meaningful, valuable information. While companies are investing heavily in initiatives to increase the amount of data at their disposal, most information workers are spending more time finding the data they need rather than putting it to work, according to Database Trends and Applications (DBTA). erwin is co-sponsoring a DBTA webinar on this topic on July 17. To register, click here.

The need for faster and smarter data integration capabilities is growing. At the same time, to deliver business value, people need information they can trust to act on, so balancing governance is absolutely critical, especially with new regulations.

Organizations often invest heavily in individual software development tools for managing projects, requirements, designs, development, testing, deployment, releases, etc. Tools lacking inter-operability often result in cumbersome manual processes and heavy time investments to synchronize data or processes between these disparate tools.

Data integration combines data from several various sources into a unified view, making it more actionable and valuable to those accessing it.

Getting the Data Governance “EDGE”

The benefits of integrated data governance discussed above won’t be realized if it is isolated within IT with no input from other stakeholders, the day-to-day data users – from sales and customer service to the C-suite. Every data citizen has DG roles and responsibilities to ensure data units have context, meaning they are labeled, cataloged and secured correctly so they can be analyzed and used properly. In other words, the data can be trusted.

Once an organization understands that IT and the business are both responsible for data, it can develop comprehensive, holistic data governance capable of:

  • Reaching every stakeholder in the process
  • Providing a platform for understanding and governing trusted data assets
  • Delivering the greatest benefit from data wherever it lives, while minimizing risk
  • Helping users understand the impact of changes made to a specific data element across the enterprise.

To reduce the risks of and tackle the reasons for bad data and realize larger organizational objectives, organizations must make data governance everyone’s business.

To learn more about the collaborative approach to data governance and how it helps compliance in addition to adding value and reducing costs, get the free e-book here.

Data governance is everyone's business

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Defining Data Governance: What Is Data Governance?

Data governance (DG) is one of the fastest growing disciplines, yet when it comes to defining data governance many organizations struggle.

Dataversity says DG is “the practices and processes which help to ensure the formal management of data assets within an organization.” These practices and processes can vary, depending on an organization’s needs. Therefore, when defining data governance for your organization, it’s important to consider the factors driving its adoption.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has contributed significantly to data governance’s escalating prominence. In fact, erwin’s 2018 State of Data Governance Report found that 60% of organizations consider regulatory compliance to be their biggest driver of data governance.

Defining data governance: DG Drivers

Other significant drivers include improving customer trust/satisfaction and encouraging better decision-making, but they trail behind regulatory compliance at 49% and 45% respectively. Reputation management (30%), analytics (27%) and Big Data (21%) also are factors.

But data governance’s adoption is of little benefit without understanding how DG should be applied within these contexts. This is arguably one of the issues that’s held data governance back in the past.

With no set definition, and the historical practice of isolating data governance within IT, organizations often have had different ideas of what data governance is, even between departments. With this inter-departmental disconnect, it’s not hard to imagine why data governance has historically left a lot to be desired.

However, with the mandate for DG within GDPR, organizations must work on defining data governance organization-wide to manage its successful implementation, or face GDPR’s penalties.

Defining Data Governance: Desired Outcomes

A great place to start when defining an organization-wide DG initiative is to consider the desired business outcomes. This approach ensures that all parties involved have a common goal.

Past examples of Data Governance 1.0 were mainly concerned with cataloging data to support search and discovery. The nature of this approach, coupled with the fact that DG initiatives were typically siloed within IT departments without input from the wider business, meant the practice often struggled to add value.

Without input from the wider business, the data cataloging process suffered from a lack of context. By neglecting to include the organization’s primary data citizens – those that manage and or leverage data on a day-to-day basis for analysis and insight – organizational data was often plagued by duplications, inconsistencies and poor quality.

The nature of modern data-driven business means that such data citizens are spread throughout the organization. Furthermore, many of the key data citizens (think value-adding approaches to data use such as data-driven marketing) aren’t actively involved with IT departments.

Because of this, Data Governance 1.0 initiatives fizzled out at discouraging frequencies.

This is, of course, problematic for organizations that identify regulatory compliance as a driver of data governance. Considering the nature of data-driven business – with new data being constantly captured, stored and leveraged – meeting compliance standards can’t be viewed as a one-time fix, so data governance can’t be de-prioritized and left to fizzle out.

Even those businesses that manage to maintain the level of input data governance needs on an indefinite basis, will find the Data Governance 1.0 approach wanting. In terms of regulatory compliance, the lack of context associated with data governance 1.0, and the inaccuracies it leads to mean that potentially serious data governance issues could go unfounded and result in repercussions for non-compliance.

We recommend organizations look beyond just data cataloging and compliance as desired outcomes when implementing DG. In the data-driven business landscape, data governance finds its true potential as a value-added initiative.

Organizations that identify the desired business outcome of data governance as a value-added initiative should also consider data governance 1.0’s shortcomings and any organizations that hasn’t identified value-adding as a business outcome, should ask themselves, “why?”

Many of the biggest market disruptors of the 21st Century have been digital savvy start-ups with robust data strategies – think Airbnb, Amazon and Netflix. Without high data governance standards, such companies would not have the level of trust in their data to confidently action such digital-first strategies, making them difficult to manage.

Therefore, in the data-driven business era, organizations should consider a Data Governance 2.0 strategy, with DG becoming an organization-wide, strategic initiative that de-silos the practice from the confines of IT.

This collaborative take on data governance intrinsically involves data’s biggest beneficiaries and users in the governance process, meaning functions like data cataloging benefit from greater context, accuracy and consistency.

It also means that organizations can have greater trust in their data and be more assured of meeting the standards set for regulatory compliance. It means that organizations can better respond to customer needs through more accurate methods of profiling and analysis, improving rates of satisfaction. And it means that organizations are less likely to suffer data breaches and their associated damages.

Defining Data Governance: The Enterprise Data Governance Experience (EDGE)

The EDGE is the erwin approach to Data Governance 2.0, empowering an organization to:

  • Manage any data, anywhere (Any2)
  • Instil a culture of collaboration and organizational empowerment
  • Introduce an integrated ecosystem for data management that draws from one central repository and ensures data (including real-time changes) is consistent throughout the organization
  • Have visibility across domains by breaking down silos between business and IT and introducing a common data vocabulary
  • Have regulatory peace of mind through mitigation of a wide range of risks, from GDPR to cybersecurity. 

To learn more about implementing data governance, click here.

Take the DG RediChek

Categories
erwin Expert Blog

Pillars of Data Governance Readiness: Enterprise Data Management Methodology

Facebook’s data woes continue to dominate the headlines and further highlight the importance of having an enterprise-wide view of data assets. The high-profile case is somewhat different than other prominent data scandals as it wasn’t a “breach,” per se. But questions of negligence persist, and in all cases, data governance is an issue.

This week, the Wall Street Journal ran a story titled “Companies Should Beware Public’s Rising Anxiety Over Data.” It discusses an IBM poll of 10,000 consumers in which 78% of U.S. respondents say a company’s ability to keep their data private is extremely important, yet only 20% completely trust organizations they interact with to maintain data privacy. In fact, 60% indicate they’re more concerned about cybersecurity than a potential war.

The piece concludes with a clear lesson for CIOs: “they must make data governance and compliance with regulations such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation [GDPR] an even greater priority, keeping track of data and making sure that the corporation has the ability to monitor its use, and should the need arise, delete it.”

With a more thorough data governance initiative and a better understanding of data assets, their lineage and useful shelf-life, and the privileges behind their access, Facebook likely could have gotten ahead of the problem and quelled it before it became an issue.  Sometimes erasure is the best approach if the reward from keeping data onboard is outweighed by the risk.

But perhaps Facebook is lucky the issue arose when it did. Once the GDPR goes into effect, this type of data snare would make the company non-compliant, as the regulation requires direct consent from the data owner (as well as notification within 72 hours if there is an actual breach).

Five Pillars of DG: Enterprise Data Management Methodology

Considering GDPR, as well as the gargantuan PR fallout and governmental inquiries Facebook faced, companies can’t afford such data governance mistakes.

During the past few weeks, we’ve been exploring each of the five pillars of data governance readiness in detail and how they come together to provide a full view of an organization’s data assets. In this blog, we’ll look at enterprise data management methodology as the fourth key pillar.

Enterprise Data Management in Four Steps

Enterprise data management methodology addresses the need for data governance within the wider data management suite, with all components and solutions working together for maximum benefits.

A successful data governance initiative should both improve a business’ understanding of data lineage/history and install a working system of permissions to prevent access by the wrong people. On the flip side, successful data governance makes data more discoverable, with better context so the right people can make better use of it.

This is the nature of Data Governance 2.0 – helping organizations better understand their data assets and making them easier to manage and capitalize on – and it succeeds where Data Governance 1.0 stumbled.

Enterprise Data Management: So where do you start?

  1. Metadata management provides the organization with the contextual information concerning its data assets. Without it, data governance essentially runs blind.

The value of metadata management is the ability to govern common and reference data used across the organization with cross-departmental standards and definitions, allowing data sharing and reuse, reducing data redundancy and storage, avoiding data errors due to incorrect choices or duplications, and supporting data quality and analytics capabilities.

  1. Your organization also needs to understand enterprise data architecture and enterprise data modeling. Without it, enterprise data governance will be hard to support

Enterprise data architecture supports data governance through concepts such as data movement, data transformation and data integration – since data governance develops policies and standards for these activities.

Data modeling, a vital component of data architecture, is also critical to data governance. By providing insights into the use cases satisfied by the data, organizations can do a better job of proactively analyzing the required shelf-life and better measure the risk/reward of keeping that data around.

Data stewards serve as SMEs in the development and refinement of data models and assist in the creation of data standards that are represented by data models. These artifacts allow your organization to achieve its business goals using enterprise data architecture.

  1. Let’s face it, most organizations implement data governance because they want high quality data. Enterprise data governance is foundational for the success of data quality management.

Data governance supports data quality efforts through the development of standard policies, practices, data standards, common definitions, etc. Data stewards implement these data standards and policies, supporting the data quality professionals.

These standards, policies, and practices lead to effective and sustainable data governance.

  1. Finally, without business intelligence (BI) and analytics, data governance will not add any value. The value of data governance to BI and analytics is the ability to govern data from its sources to destinations in warehouses/marts, define standards for data across those stages, and promote common algorithms and calculations where appropriate. These benefits allow the organization to achieve its business goals with BI and analytics.

Gaining an EDGE on the Competition

Old-school data governance is one-sided, mainly concerned with cataloging data to support search and discovery. The lack of short-term value here often caused executive support to dwindle, so the task of DG was siloed within IT.

These issues are circumvented by using the collaborative Data Governance 2.0 approach, spreading the responsibility of DG among those who use the data. This means that data assets are recorded with more context and are of greater use to an organization.

It also means executive-level employees are more aware of data governance working as they’re involved in it, as well as seeing the extra revenue potential in optimizing data analysis streams and the resulting improvements to times to market.

We refer to this enterprise-wide, collaborative, 2.0 take on data governance as the enterprise data governance experience (EDGE). But organizational collaboration aside, the real EDGE is arguably the collaboration it facilitates between solutions. The EDGE platform recognizes the fundamental reliance data governance has on the enterprise data management methodology suite and unifies them.

By existing on one platform, and sharing one repository, organizations can guarantee their data is uniform across the organization, regardless of department.

Additionally, it drastically improves workflows by allowing for real-time updates across the platform. For example, a change to a term in the data dictionary (data governance) will be automatically reflected in all connected data models (data modeling).

Further, the EDGE integrates enterprise architecture to define application capabilities and interdependencies within the context of their connection to enterprise strategy, enabling technology investments to be prioritized in line with business goals.

Business process also is included so enterprises can clearly define, map and analyze workflows and build models to drive process improvement, as well as identify business practices susceptible to the greatest security, compliance or other risks and where controls are most needed to mitigate exposures.

Essentially, it’s the approach data governance needs to become a value-adding strategic initiative instead of an isolated effort that peters out.

To learn more about enterprise data management and getting an EDGE on GDPR and the competition, click here.

To assess your data governance readiness ahead of the GDPR, click here.

Take the DG RediChek